761. Special Binary String - Detailed Explanation
1. Problem Statement
A special binary string is a binary string that satisfies the following properties:
- It is non-empty.
- It is balanced: it contains the same number of
'1's and'0's. - For every prefix of the string, the number of
'1's is greater than or equal to the number of'0's.
Problem:
Given a special binary string S, you are allowed to perform the following operation any number of times:
- Choose two consecutive, non-empty, special binary substrings in
Sand swap them.
Return the lexicographically largest string you can obtain after performing these operations.
Example 1
- Input:
S = "11011000" - Output:
"11100100" - Explanation:
The string"11011000"can be partitioned and reassembled by swapping its special substrings. One optimal transformation yields"11100100", which is lexicographically larger than the original.
Example 2
- Input:
S = "10" - Output:
"10" - Explanation:
With only two characters, the string"10"is already the only possible special binary string.
Constraints
- The length of
Sis between 1 and 50. Sis guaranteed to be a special binary string.
2. Hints and Key Observations
-
Structure Resembling Valid Parentheses:
Notice that a special binary string follows the same structure as a valid parentheses string if you consider'1'as'('and'0'as')'. This means every special binary string can be uniquely decomposed into “primitive” (or “indecomposable”) special substrings. -
Decomposition Insight:
As you scanS, maintain a counter: increment it for'1'and decrement for'0'. Every time the counter returns to 0, you have found a special substring.
For example, in"11011000", scanning from left to right:- Start: count = 0
- Read
'1'→ count = 1 - Read
'1'→ count = 2 - Read
'0'→ count = 1 - Read
'1'→ count = 2 - Read
'1'→ count = 3 - Read
'0'→ count = 2 - Read
'0'→ count = 1 - Read
'0'→ count = 0
Here, the entire string is a valid special substring, but it may contain nested special substrings.
-
Lexicographical Order via Recursion:
The key observation is that if you can recursively process the inner parts of a special substring, then by sorting the resulting pieces in descending order and concatenating them, you achieve the lexicographically largest string.
Detailed Approach
Recursive Decomposition
-
Partition the String:
- Initialize a counter and an index pointer
i = 0. - Iterate through the string with an index
j. - Update the counter: add 1 for
'1'and subtract 1 for'0'. - When the counter becomes 0, it means the substring
S[i:j+1]is a balanced special binary string.
- Initialize a counter and an index pointer
-
Process the Inner Part:
- Remove the outer characters (the first
'1'and the last'0') from the substring. - Recursively process the inner substring (
S[i+1:j]) to get its lexicographically largest form.
- Remove the outer characters (the first
-
Wrap and Collect:
- Form the string as
"1" + <result of recursion> + "0". - Collect all such processed substrings.
- Form the string as
-
Sort and Concatenate:
- Sort the collected substrings in descending order.
- Concatenate them to obtain the final result.
Visual Walkthrough (Example: S = "11011000")
-
Step 1:
Begin scanning"11011000".
The entire string is a special substring since the counter reaches 0 at the end. -
Step 2:
Remove the outer'1'and'0'to get the inner substring:"101100". -
Step 3:
Recursively process"101100"by similarly partitioning it into its special substrings, processing each recursively, and then sorting them in descending order. -
Step 4:
Finally, wrap each processed substring with'1'and'0', sort them, and join them together to get"11100100".
4. Complexity Analysis
-
Time Complexity:
In the worst case, the algorithm runs in O(n²) due to the recursive decomposition and the sorting at each level (with n ≤ 50, this is acceptable). -
Space Complexity:
O(n) for recursion and temporary storage.
Code Implementations
Python Implementation
Java Implementation
Common Pitfalls and Edge Cases
Common Mistakes
-
Not Recursively Processing the Inner Substring:
Failing to apply the same transformation on the inner substring leads to an incorrect final order. -
Incorrect Partitioning:
Not using the counter properly might result in an incorrect partitioning ofSinto special substrings. -
Sorting Order:
Sorting the substrings in ascending order instead of descending will not produce the lexicographically largest result.
Edge Cases
-
Shortest Special String:
The smallest special binary string is"10". In this case, there’s nothing to swap, and the output remains"10". -
Already Largest:
IfSis already the lexicographically largest, the recursive process will returnSwithout any changes. -
Nested Special Substrings:
Ensure that deeply nested special substrings are processed correctly by recursion.
Related Problems for Further Practice
- Valid Parentheses
- Longest Valid Parentheses
- Remove Invalid Parentheses
GET YOUR FREE
Coding Questions Catalog
$197

$78
$78