How do you build distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry at scale?

Distributed tracing ties a user request across many services so you can see the full story of latency, errors, and resource use. OpenTelemetry gives you a vendor neutral path to instrument code, propagate context, collect spans, and export traces at production scale. In this guide you will learn how to design a tracing stack that is reliable, cost aware, and ready for the system design interview as well as real distributed systems.

Why It Matters

Modern apps are a web of services, queues, databases, caches, and third party calls. When something slows down the user experience, logs alone rarely show the full path. Tracing reveals the end to end critical path with timing for each hop. For interviews this topic signals that you can reason about observability, performance, and service boundaries. In production it reduces mean time to detect and mean time to resolve, aligns with SLOs, and prevents expensive guesswork.

How It Works Step by Step

1. Core tracing model

A trace represents one request or workflow. It is made of spans. Each span has a name, start and end timestamps, attributes key value pairs, optional events, and a status. Spans form a tree through parent child relationships. Spans can also have links when work fans out across queues or when two traces need correlation.

2. Context propagation

Context carries the trace ID and span ID across process boundaries. Standardize on W3C Trace Context using two headers traceparent and tracestate and add baggage for small metadata like tenant or plan. Your gateways should accept these headers from clients and inject them into outbound calls. For background jobs put the headers into message metadata so consumers can resume the same trace.

3. Instrumentation strategy

Start with auto instrumentation for languages like Java, Go, Python, and Node.js to capture common libraries HTTP, gRPC, SQL, messaging. Then add manual spans for business operations checkout, payment authorization, feed generation, recommendation scoring. Use consistent names and attributes. Adopt a resource template across all services with service.name, service.namespace, and service.instance.id.

4. The OpenTelemetry Collector pattern

The Collector is the data plane for traces. Run it as a local agent on each node or as a sidecar per pod to buffer and send data, and as a gateway tier to centralize processing and exporting. Build a pipeline of receivers OTLP, processors, and exporters. Processors enforce scrubbing and sampling. Exporters send OTLP to backends like Jaeger or Grafana Tempo or a commercial APM.

5. Head sampling, tail sampling, and adaptive policies

Head sampling happens in the SDK before spans are created. It is cheap and gives consistent rates but cannot select on outcomes you do not yet know. Tail sampling happens at the Collector or backend after the full trace arrives so you can keep rare cases like high latency, errors, or specific routes. Large systems mix both. Use head sampling to cap worst case volume and tail sampling to promote interesting traces. Add priority rules such as keep all traces with status error, keep top percent of highest latency per route, keep all traces for new releases for the first hour.

6. Cost and cardinality control

Cardinality explosions hurt query speed and cost. Cap attributes that contain user IDs, session tokens, or dynamic URLs. Prefer grouping attributes route template rather than full path. Enforce an allow list with the attributes processor, drop list anything with unbounded values, and truncate long strings. Set retention by environment and by team. Production hot traces might have seven days, warm storage thirty days, and long term storage only for audit or compliance.

7. Secure by default

Mark privacy sensitive fields and redact them in the Collector with transform processors. Use TLS everywhere and mTLS inside the cluster. Scope API keys per team. Keep separate projects or tenants for staging and production to prevent accidental cross reads. Limit baggage keys to non sensitive data because baggage propagates widely.

8. Connect traces, metrics, and logs

Traces should not live alone. Add span metrics such as request count, error count, and latency histograms for dashboards and alerting. Attach exemplars so a metric spike links to example trace IDs. Add a log record to each span that contains the trace ID so you can pivot from logs to traces and back without regex adventures.

9. Multi region and multi tenant design

Run a local Collector in each region to absorb bursts. Export over OTLP to a regional gateway then to a global store or a per region store depending on law and latency. For tenants add a resource attribute tenant and enforce per tenant quotas and sampling budgets. When a workflow crosses regions or clouds, use span links to stitch related work when a single parent child relationship is not possible.

10. Governance and reliability

Make instrumentation a contract. Publish naming conventions, required attributes, and sampling defaults. Version your Collector configs in Git and roll out with canary. Add liveness and readiness probes on the Collector and alert on queue depth to catch backpressure early. Write synthetic probes that generate a simple trace through critical services every minute so you always know tracing is healthy.

Real World Example

Imagine a large marketplace with web and mobile clients, a gateway API, a cart service, a payment service, and a recommendation service backed by Kafka. The gateway accepts traceparent and tracestate from the client and begins a trace if none exist. Auto instrumentation emits spans for inbound HTTP and outbound calls to cart and payment. The cart service propagates the context into its Redis calls and into Kafka when it publishes an event for the recommendation service. Kafka carries traceparent in message headers so the consumer resumes the trace and adds a span for model scoring. The Collector runs as a node agent in every cluster. Head sampling keeps a small percent of normal traffic, while the gateway adds a tag for user plan to baggage. The gateway region level Collector applies tail sampling that keeps all error traces and the top percentile of latency per route. During a checkout incident the on call opens the checkout SLO dashboard, clicks an exemplar for a slow request, and lands on a full trace that shows the payment provider call waiting on DNS. The fix is targeted and fast.

Common Pitfalls or Trade offs

  • Missing propagation in async flows. Queues, streams, and background workers must copy traceparent into message metadata or context will break.

  • Unbounded attributes. User agent strings, raw URLs, and request bodies cause high cardinality and cost. Normalize aggressively.

  • Over sampling or under sampling. If everything is sampled you drown in data. If too little is sampled, you cannot debug rare cases. Calibrate by route and by outcome.

  • Single point bottleneck. A single central Collector becomes a choke point. Use local agents with a tiered gateway.

  • Inconsistent service naming. If half your services report different names or versions, trace trees look fragmented. Treat service name as a strict contract.

Interview Tip

A favorite prompt is to design tracing for a ride sharing app where requests fan out to pricing, driver location, and payment. Start by stating the data model trace, span, attributes, events, links. Add propagation with W3C headers for HTTP and message headers for Kafka. Show both head and tail sampling rules tied to SLOs. Close with storage and retention choices, cost controls, and a clear plan for redaction.

Key Takeaways

  • Tracing reveals the end to end path so you can debug latency and errors across services.
  • OpenTelemetry unifies instrumentation, context propagation, and export with a flexible Collector.
  • Mix head and tail sampling to stay on budget while keeping the most valuable traces.
  • Control cardinality, redact sensitive data, and standardize naming to keep the system healthy.
  • Tie traces to metrics and logs to speed detection and diagnosis.

Table of Comparison

OptionStrengthsWeaknessesBest Fit
OpenTelemetry with CollectorVendor neutral, rich processors, works with many backends, strong communityNeeds thoughtful config and governanceLarge teams that want control and portability
Jaeger stackMature UI, integrates well with OTel, good for self hosted setupsStorage can be heavy if retention is longTeams comfortable with self managed observability
Grafana TempoObject storage friendly, scales to very large volumes, good with exemplarsUI features arrive via Grafana plugins, requires S3 like storageHigh volume traces with cost control via object storage
Zipkin nativeSimple model, light footprintFewer processors and policies than OTel CollectorSmall teams or legacy setups
Custom correlation IDs onlyMinimal overhead, easy to add to logsNo span tree, limited timing insight, hard queriesTemporary stopgap while migrating to OTel

FAQs

Q1. What is OpenTelemetry and why should I use it for distributed systems?

OpenTelemetry is an open standard that defines APIs, SDKs, and a Collector to create, process, and export telemetry. It prevents vendor lock in and gives you a single model for traces across languages and frameworks.

Q2. What is the difference between head sampling and tail sampling?

Head sampling makes a keep or drop decision at the start of a request based on simple rules. Tail sampling decides after the trace completes so it can keep important cases like errors or slow requests at the cost of more processing.

Q3. How do I propagate trace context through Kafka or other queues?

Write the W3C traceparent, tracestate, and optional baggage into message headers on the producer side and read them on the consumer side to continue the same trace. Many OTel libraries handle this automatically.

Q4. Which backend should I choose for storing traces at scale?

Start with a backend your team already uses for metrics or logs to reduce operational load. Jaeger and Tempo are common choices for self hosted setups. Evaluate storage cost, query latency, and ecosystem fit.

Q5. How can I keep tracing costs under control?

Use a mix of head and tail sampling, drop or normalize high cardinality attributes, set retention by environment, and align sampling with SLOs so you always keep the most valuable traces.

Q6. How do traces relate to metrics and logs in a scalable architecture?

Traces give the narrative for a request. Metrics provide fast aggregates for alerting. Logs record detailed events. Link them using trace IDs and exemplars so you can jump between layers during incidents.

Further Learning

If you want a gentle path from basics to real design decisions, start with the foundations in Grokking System Design Fundamentals.

To practice large scale tradeoffs like sampling, storage, and multi region topologies, deepen your skills in Grokking Scalable Systems for Interviews.

TAGS
System Design Interview
System Design Fundamentals
CONTRIBUTOR
Design Gurus Team
-

GET YOUR FREE

Coding Questions Catalog

Design Gurus Newsletter - Latest from our Blog
Boost your coding skills with our essential coding questions catalog.
Take a step towards a better tech career now!
Image
One-Stop Portal For Tech Interviews.
Copyright © 2025 Design Gurus, LLC. All rights reserved.