How does caching work and what are common caching strategies in system design?

Free Coding Questions Catalog

Boost your coding skills with our essential coding questions catalog. Take a step towards a better tech career now!

Caching is like having a quick-reference notebook for your data. Instead of reaching out to a slow database or service for the same information repeatedly, a cache stores frequently used data in a fast storage layer (often memory) so future requests get that data much faster. This simple idea can dramatically improve an app’s speed and scalability. In fact, caching is such a key technique in system architecture that it often comes up in system design interviews. In this beginner-friendly article, we’ll explain how caching works, why it’s important, and outline common caching strategies in system design (with real-world examples).

(For a comprehensive guide focused on caching in system design interviews, check out our blog post Mastering the Art of Caching for System Design Interviews.

What Is Caching and How Does It Work?

Caching is the process of storing a copy of data in a temporary storage location so it can be accessed more quickly. In simple terms, a cache is a shortcut: it sits between the client (or application) and the main data source (like a database) to serve repeated requests faster. When your application needs some data, it will check the cache first before doing any heavy lifting.

Cache hit: If the data is found in the cache, the application returns it immediately from the fast cache. (This is like finding your notes right on your desk – no need to search the library.)
Cache miss: If the data isn’t in the cache, the application fetches it from the original source (database, API, etc.), then stores a copy in the cache for next time. (It’s like going to the library once, but saving a copy of the info in your notebook so you don’t have to go again.)

This pattern of loading data on demand is known as cache-aside (or “lazy loading”) and is the most common caching approach. The first request for a piece of data may still be slow (since it falls back to the database on a miss), but subsequent requests will be very fast if they hit the cache. (A cache hit means the cache had the data; a cache miss means it didn’t.)

Real-world example: Your web browser uses caching to speed up page loads. The first time you visit a website, your browser downloads images, scripts, and other files. It saves them in a local cache on your device. The next time you visit, the browser can load those files from the cache instead of downloading them again, so the page appears much more quickly. Similarly, in system design, if an application caches results from a database query, it can return answers to repeated queries in milliseconds rather than seconds.

Why Caching Matters in System Design

Caching isn’t just a “nice-to-have” – it’s often essential for building high-performance, scalable system design. Here are some benefits of caching:

Faster response times: Serving data from a cache (especially an in-memory cache) is much quicker than querying a disk-based database or a remote service. A cache that’s closer to the user or in the app’s memory means less travel time for data, resulting in lower latency. Users get information faster, improving the experience.
Reduced backend load: Each cache hit spares the backend from work. By reusing results, caching lowers the number of direct database or API calls needed. This cuts down on expensive operations – the database doesn’t have to run the same query over and over, for example – which can also translate to cost savings and less stress on your servers.
Better scalability: With caching, the system can handle more traffic with the same resources. Frequently accessed data is served from the cache’s high-speed layer, while the database handles fewer repetitive reads. This way, as user load grows, the bottleneck is eased by the cache. (At Amazon, engineers observed that after adding a cache, request latency went down and costs were reduced, allowing them to scale down some database resources.) By absorbing read load, caches help applications scale effortlessly to more users.
Improved user experience: Ultimately, caching leads to snappier applications. Pages load faster and data appears with less delay. Users are less likely to abandon a slow service. In high-traffic applications and microservices, thoughtful caching can be “the difference between an application that scales effortlessly and one that struggles”.

Bottom line: Caching makes your system faster, more efficient, and more resilient to high load. It’s a fundamental technique in system architecture for achieving high performance at scale. (Of course, as we’ll discuss, it’s important to use caching wisely to avoid consistency issues.)

Common Caching Strategies in System Design

There are several caching strategies and patterns used in system design. The best strategy for a given system depends on how data is accessed and updated. Below are some of the most common caching strategies:

Cache-Aside (Lazy Loading)

Cache-aside is the simplest and most widely used strategy. We actually saw how this works in the earlier section: the application checks the cache on every read, and only goes to the database if there’s a cache miss. When a miss happens, the data fetched from the database is added to the cache so that subsequent requests can be served quickly from memory. Cache-aside puts the responsibility on the application to populate the cache as needed (hence “lazy” loading).

Advantages: Easy to implement and naturally caches only the data that’s actually needed. The cache never grows larger than what users ask for, keeping it cost-effective. Also, you get immediate performance improvements on cache hits without complex coordination – many web frameworks support this pattern out of the box.
Drawbacks: The first time a particular item is requested, it’s not cached (cache miss), so that request will have the full latency of fetching from the database. In other words, cache-aside trades a slightly slower first request for many faster subsequent requests. Also, if data isn’t accessed again before it expires, caching it might not have provided much benefit.

Write-Through Caching

In a write-through strategy, every data write (update or insert) goes through the cache on its way to the database. This means whenever the application updates the database, it also immediately updates the cache to keep the cache in sync. Essentially, the cache is proactively populated on writes, not just on reads. For example, if a user updates their profile, the new profile data is written to both the database and the cache at the same time.

Advantages: Data in the cache is always fresh after a write, so readers rarely see stale data. It also avoids the cache-miss penalty for recently written data – since writes push data into the cache, upcoming reads will likely hit the cache. This can make the application feel very responsive for read-heavy workloads where data is frequently updated behind the scenes (no waiting for a first read to populate the cache). And because the cache is kept up-to-date, you simplify cache invalidation for those items.
Drawbacks: Write-through caching can unnecessarily fill the cache with data that isn’t read often. As AWS notes, infrequently-requested data is also written to the cache, resulting in a larger and more expensive cache. In other words, you might be caching some items that never get read before they expire, which is wasteful. Also, write operations now have a bit more overhead (they have to write to two places, though the cache write is usually very fast). If the write load is high, this strategy can generate a lot of cache churn (constant updates).

Real-world usage: Many systems combine write-through and cache-aside for a balanced approach. For example, you might use write-through for a small set of critical data that must always be quick to read (ensuring it’s always cached), and use cache-aside for everything else. This way, you avoid cache misses on hot items without caching tons of cold data. (We’ll discuss expiration policies in a moment – even write-through caches usually set a time-to-live so old data eventually evicts.)

Note: Another variant is write-back (write-behind) caching. In a write-back scheme, the application writes data only to the cache at first, and the cache later asynchronously writes it to the database. This can make write operations very fast for the user, but it introduces complexity – if the cache node fails before the data is written to the database, you could lose that write. Write-back caches are less common in high-level system design discussions (they’re more often seen in hardware or specialized systems), but it’s good to be aware of the concept. Unless specifically asked or needed, most system designs stick to some mix of cache-aside and write-through (or the related “write-around” strategy) for simplicity and reliability.

Distributed Caching

In small applications, a cache might live inside a single server (for example, an in-memory cache like a Python dictionary or a Redis instance on one machine). But distributed caching is used in larger, distributed systems to scale the cache itself. A distributed cache pools together the memory of multiple machines to form a cluster that acts as a single cache store. This means the cache can store much more data and handle far more requests than a cache on one server. All the application servers in a cluster can share the distributed cache, seeing the same cached data.

A distributed cache is essentially a cache service that runs on a cluster of nodes. Data is partitioned (and often replicated) across those nodes. For example, popular distributed caching systems like Redis or Memcached can be set up as a cluster so that each node handles a portion of the cached data. The system might use consistent hashing or other techniques to decide which node stores which pieces of data.

Benefits: Distributed caches combine a lot of memory and network capacity, so they can scale horizontally as your data grows. You can add more cache nodes to increase capacity or throughput, enabling the cache to grow with your application’s needs. This is crucial for high-volume environments – the cache won’t become a single-server bottleneck. Also, all clients (app servers) sharing the cache get a consistent view of cached data, which simplifies cache coordination in a multi-server setup.
Challenges: A distributed cache introduces complexity like network communication between app servers and cache nodes, and synchronization issues if not managed properly. You have to consider what happens if a cache node goes down (data on that node is temporarily lost, which might increase cache misses until it’s repopulated). There’s also a slight network hop latency compared to an in-memory cache on the same server, but it’s still much faster than hitting a distant database in most cases.

Real-world example: Modern web architecture often uses a distributed in-memory cache layer (e.g. a Redis cluster) between the app and database. For instance, multiple microservices might all query a shared Redis cluster for config settings or session data. Another example is a Content Delivery Network (CDN) – which you can think of as an internet-wide distributed cache. A CDN caches content on servers around the world (at the “edge”), so users are served by a nearby location rather than the origin server. This is a form of distributed caching that greatly reduces latency for global users and offloads traffic from the primary server.

(For a deeper dive into advanced caching at scale, see our Detailed Strategies for Mastering Distributed Caching in System Design guide.)

Caching Best Practices and Considerations

Using a cache is powerful, but it introduces new design considerations. Here are some best practices and things to keep in mind for caching in system design:

Use expiration (TTL): It’s important to decide how long cached data should live. In practice, we assign a time-to-live (TTL) to cache entries. After that time, the cache will treat the data as stale and typically evict or refresh it. AWS recommends always setting a TTL on your cache keys (except perhaps in cases of strict write-through) so that stale data doesn’t live forever. For rapidly changing data, a short TTL (e.g. a few seconds) ensures the cache auto-expires old values, trading some consistency for performance. Choosing the right TTL is a balance: too short and you lose caching benefits; too long and data might become outdated. If you’re unsure, it’s often safer to cache with an expiration than to cache indefinitely. (You can also manually invalidate cache entries when underlying data changes – for example, delete or update the cache key when you update the database – but TTL acts as a safety net in case you miss something.)
Choose an eviction policy: What if the cache fills up its memory? In that case, it needs to evict (remove) some entries to free space for new data. A cache’s eviction policy determines which entries to remove. A very common strategy is Least Recently Used (LRU) – the cache evicts the item that hasn’t been accessed for the longest time. The assumption is that if you haven’t used something in a while, you’re less likely to need it again soon (so it’s safe to toss out). Other policies include Least Frequently Used (LFU), First-In-First-Out (FIFO), or even random eviction. For most cases, an LRU-based policy works well and is widely used. The key is to pick an eviction policy that fits your usage pattern, and ensure your cache size is tuned so that it doesn’t thrash (constantly evicting items you soon need again).
Cache data selectively: Avoid the temptation to cache everything. Not all data is worth caching. If each request almost always asks for unique data that no other request will reuse, caching that data won’t help much. For example, imagine a service that generates one-time tokens or serves constantly changing data – caching those results might be pointless because you rarely get a cache hit. Focus on caching the expensive operations and the hot data – data that is expensive to compute or fetch, and that is requested frequently. This will give you a high cache hit ratio, meaning most requests find their data in cache. High hit ratios are a good indicator that your cache is providing value. (In practice, monitoring cache hits/misses is important to evaluate if your strategy is working.)
Maintain consistency (stale data): A famous saying in computer science is that cache invalidation is one of the hardest problems. By caching a copy of data, you’ve introduced the possibility that the cache and the source database can get out of sync. Cached data will inevitably become stale as the source-of-truth data changes. You need a plan for this. Common approaches include: invalidate or update cache entries when the underlying data changes; or simply accept eventual consistency (small delays before caches reflect updates) and design your system to tolerate it. Often, a combination is used: important data might be updated in the cache immediately on changes (e.g. write-through for critical info), while less critical data just expires after TTL. The tolerance for stale data depends on your application requirements. For instance, caching user profile info for a few minutes might be fine (eventually it updates), but caching stock prices for minutes could be a problem. Always consider consistency and document how your cache stays correct. Caching can only be successful long-term if the system and users can handle the slight inconsistencies it introduces.
Employ caching thoughtfully: Don’t just add a cache and forget about it – think about what to cache, when to refresh or invalidate it, and how it impacts your overall design. Caching should be tailored to your system’s specific data access patterns. For example, if you have data that must be absolutely up-to-date, you might not cache it at all (or use a very short TTL). If you have data that’s large but rarely used, you might skip caching that to save space for more popular items. Be mindful of edge cases like cache stampede (many clients requesting a item that just expired – one mitigation is using techniques like request coalescing or slightly staggering expirations). With a thoughtful strategy, caching will greatly enhance your system’s performance. (For more tips on effective caching patterns and avoiding pitfalls, see our article on employing caching strategies thoughtfully.)

By following these best practices – using expirations, choosing the right eviction policy, caching the right data, and keeping caches in sync – you can make the most of caching while minimizing problems. Good caching design often requires monitoring and tweaking, but it pays off with systems that are both fast and robust.

FAQs

Q1. What is caching in system design?

Caching is a technique in system design for storing frequently accessed data in a faster storage layer (like memory) so that future requests for that data can be served quickly. Instead of going all the way to a database or slow service every time, the application checks the cache first. This reduces the work the system has to do repeatedly and improves overall response times.

Q2. How does caching improve system performance?

Caching improves performance by enabling faster data retrieval and reducing the load on slower backend components. When data is served from a cache (which is usually in-memory or closer to the user), responses arrive much quicker than if the data came from a disk or remote server. It also means the database or API is accessed less frequently, which lowers latency and allows the system to handle more requests concurrently without slowing down.

Q3. What are common caching strategies in system design?

Common caching strategies include cache-aside (lazy loading) and write-through caching. In a cache-aside approach, the application loads data into the cache only when there’s a cache miss (on-demand loading of data into cache). In a write-through approach, whenever data is written or updated in the system, the cache is updated at the same time as the primary database. This ensures the cache is always up-to-date. Many systems use a combination of these strategies to balance data freshness and efficiency, sometimes also employing a distributed cache for scaling the cache across multiple servers.

Conclusion

Caching is a straightforward idea with a huge impact: by remembering the results of expensive operations, a system can serve repeated requests extremely fast and handle a larger scale of users. We learned that caching works by storing copies of data in a quick-access layer and that common strategies (like cache-aside and write-through) govern how and when data enters the cache. The key takeaways for a beginner are that caching reduces latency, cuts down redundant work, and improves scalability, all of which are crucial in system design. However, effective caching also means managing expiration and consistency — ensuring your cache doesn’t serve stale data for too long and doesn’t grow without bounds.

In system design interviews, caching often becomes a key talking point to show you can design for high performance at scale. Knowing when to mention a cache and how to discuss its role (e.g. “I would add a Redis cache here to alleviate database read load”) can set you apart as a candidate who understands scalable architecture. So as you prepare, remember to practice incorporating caching in your designs and explaining the rationale.

If you’d like to deepen your understanding and get hands-on practice with system design (including caching and other core concepts), consider exploring DesignGurus.io’s system design courses. The Grokking System Design Fundamentals course【5†】 is a great starting point for learning the basics of system architecture, and Grokking the System Design Interview offers advanced lessons and mock interview practice. These courses provide technical interview tips, real-world examples, and guided practice to help you master caching strategies in system design and ace your next interview. Good luck, and happy caching!

CONTRIBUTOR

Design Gurus Team

GET YOUR FREE

Coding Questions Catalog