What are microservices and how do they differ from a monolithic architecture?

In modern software development, two common system architecture styles are microservices architecture and monolithic architecture. If you've heard these terms, you might wonder: What exactly are microservices, and how are they different from a monolithic approach? In simple terms, microservices break an application into many small, independent services, while a monolith keeps everything together in one big codebase. This article will explain microservices in easy-to-understand language, compare them to monolithic design, and highlight key differences and examples.

What is Microservices Architecture?

Microservices architecture is an approach to building an application as a collection of small, independent services. Each service (or "microservice") focuses on a specific feature or business capability and can be developed and deployed on its own without affecting other parts of the system. These services communicate through well-defined APIs (often via HTTP or messaging) and work together as one application. This architecture emphasizes modularity (each service has a single responsibility), autonomy (each runs independently), and resilience (if one service fails, it’s less likely to bring down the whole app). Microservices also allow teams to use different technologies for different services. However, having many moving parts adds complexity in testing, monitoring, and deployment.

What is a Monolithic Architecture?

A monolithic architecture is the traditional way of building an application as a single, unified unit. All components (user interface, business logic, database, etc.) are part of one codebase and run together as one program. When the application needs an update or to handle more load, you have to redeploy the entire system at once. This approach is straightforward for small or simple applications. But a monolith is tightly coupled (all parts are interdependent), so as the app grows, it can become difficult to manage. A bug in one feature can potentially crash the entire application, and scaling means duplicating the whole app rather than just a part.

Microservices vs Monolithic: Key Differences

Let’s compare microservices and monolithic approaches on a few key points:

• Structure & Modularity: A monolithic application is one cohesive unit (everything runs together), whereas a microservices-based application is made up of many separate services. Monoliths are tightly coupled – components are interconnected in one program. Microservices are loosely coupled – each service is independent and interacts with others through APIs, making the system more modular.
• Development Speed: Monolithic apps can be simpler to build initially because there's just one codebase. But as they grow, multiple developers working in the same project can slow each other down, and updates become harder. Microservices let independent teams work in parallel on different services. Each team can develop, test, and deploy their service without waiting for a central release, often enabling faster iteration.
• Deployment & Scaling: In a monolithic architecture, you deploy the entire application as one piece, and to scale it, you replicate the whole app on more servers. In microservices architecture, each service can be deployed and scaled individually. You can update or scale one microservice (say, the search or payment service) without redeploying everything. This targeted scalability is more efficient for large systems, though it requires good automation to manage.
• Fault Isolation: If a microservice fails, it usually only affects that part of the application. For example, if the payment service goes down, other features (like browsing products) can still work. In a monolith, a failure in one component can crash the entire application since everything runs together. Microservices can improve reliability by isolating failures.
• Complexity & Overhead: Monolithic systems are simpler to monitor and debug because you have a single application. Microservices systems are more complex: there are many moving parts to manage (multiple services, networking, etc.). Testing and troubleshooting can also be more challenging because an issue might involve several services. In short, microservices trade simplicity for flexibility and scalability.

For example, if the checkout process of an online store needs more capacity, microservices let you scale that piece alone. With a monolith, you’d have to scale the entire application, even if only one feature is under heavy load.

(Learn more in our blog “Monolithic vs. Service-Oriented vs. Microservice Architecture” which compares these approaches.)

FAQs