What is a relational database (SQL) versus a NoSQL database, and how do you choose between them?
SQL or NoSQL?
This question is a staple of system architecture discussions and technical interviews. Understanding the differences between relational and NoSQL databases is crucial for designing scalable systems and acing interview questions.
In this article, we break down what relational (SQL) databases and NoSQL databases are, their key differences in schema design and scalability, and how to choose the right one for your needs.
By the end, you'll be able to make informed database design decisions and confidently explain your choice in a mock interview or real project.
What is a Relational Database (SQL)?
A relational database is a database that organizes data into tables (rows and columns) with defined relationships between those tables. In fact, "relational" comes from the way these tables relate via keys (identifiers) that link records across tables.
Relational databases use a predefined schema, meaning you must define the table structure (columns and data types) before inserting data. This makes them great for structured data where every record follows the same format. They use SQL (Structured Query Language) for querying and manipulating data, allowing complex joins and aggregations across tables. Popular relational database systems (RDBMS) include MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, and SQL Server.
One hallmark of SQL databases is ACID compliance. ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) guarantees that database transactions are reliable – if one part of a transaction fails, the entire transaction fails and the database state rolls back. This ensures high consistency and reliability. (Learn more in our What is RDBMS? guide.)
What is a NoSQL Database?
A NoSQL database (non-relational database) is any database that does not use the traditional table-and-relations model. The term “NoSQL” is commonly defined as “Not Only SQL,” highlighting that these databases might not use SQL at all, or not as their primary language. Instead of rigid tables, NoSQL systems store data in flexible ways (e.g. as JSON documents or key-value pairs) without requiring a fixed schema upfront.
NoSQL databases became popular to tackle the scale of modern applications. They are designed for high scalability and availability, often by distributing data across many servers. For example, NoSQL solutions excel at powering real-time web applications, social networks, or big data platforms that handle large volumes of semi-structured or unstructured data. (These systems also allow flexible, evolving schemas as requirements change, enabling rapid development.)
Types of NoSQL Databases
- Document Stores: Store records as structured documents (often JSON) with flexible schema. Example: MongoDB.
- Key-Value Stores: Store data as simple key–value pairs for quick retrieval. Examples: Redis, Amazon DynamoDB.
- Wide-Column Stores: Use tables with flexible columns, allowing different columns per row (great for very large datasets). Example: Apache Cassandra.
- Graph Databases: Store data as nodes and edges (relationships), ideal for highly connected data (e.g. social networks). Example: Neo4j.
SQL vs NoSQL: Key Differences
At a high level, SQL and NoSQL databases differ in their structure, flexibility, and intended use cases. SQL databases are relational and use structured schemas, while NoSQL databases are non-relational with dynamic schemas. They also differ in how they scale and handle data (structured vs unstructured).
Differences at a glance:
- Data Model & Schema: Relational databases use a strict table-based model with predefined schema and relationships. NoSQL databases use flexible schemas – data can be in JSON documents, key-value pairs, etc. SQL requires upfront schema design, whereas NoSQL can store data without a fixed schema.
- Scalability: SQL databases generally scale vertically (upgrading a single server’s hardware), which has limits. NoSQL databases are built to scale horizontally by adding more servers, allowing them to handle massive traffic and data growth by spreading load across nodes.
- Querying Capabilities: SQL supports complex JOINs and multi-table queries with a standardized query language (great for deep analytics and reporting). NoSQL systems typically don’t support multi-collection joins – you may need to duplicate data or fetch in multiple calls.
- Transactions & Consistency: Relational databases prioritize ACID transactions for strong consistency – you can update multiple related records reliably in one go. NoSQL databases often sacrifice some immediate consistency for availability and speed. Many NoSQL systems use eventual consistency, meaning data updates propagate over time in a cluster (though some NoSQL databases do support limited transactions, like single-document updates).
- Use Cases: Choose SQL for structured data and multi-row transactions – for example, a banking system or an online store’s inventory where data integrity is crucial. Choose NoSQL for high-volume or rapidly changing data – for instance, a social network feed, logging service, or IoT sensor data platform that needs to scale out and handle different data formats.
(For more examples and an in-depth comparison, check out our SQL vs. NoSQL: Key Differences, Use Cases & Which One to Choose article.)
How to Choose Between SQL and NoSQL
Consider factors like data structure, scale, and query complexity.
Ask yourself: is the data highly structured with relationships (favor SQL) or is it rapidly changing/huge scale (favor NoSQL)?
Do you need complex transactions or just simple operations at scale? Your answers will guide the decision.
When to Use Relational (SQL) Databases
- Need for ACID Transactions: If your application can’t tolerate data anomalies (e.g. transferring money between bank accounts), use a relational database. SQL databases ensure all-or-nothing transactions and maintain consistency.
- Structured Data & Relationships: When your data is clearly structured and you have relationships to maintain (such as users and orders, or products and categories), a relational model is ideal. It prevents duplicate data through normalization and enforces data integrity via foreign keys.
- Complex Queries & Analytics: If you will run heavy ad-hoc queries, aggregations, or need to join across multiple datasets (like generating reports or doing business analytics), SQL databases are optimized for that. They have a powerful query optimizer to handle complex joins and indexing.
- Stable Schema: Choose SQL if your data model is unlikely to change frequently and you can design the schema upfront. In scenarios like inventory systems or library catalogs, the entities and their attributes are well-known ahead of time.
When to Use NoSQL Databases
- Massive Scalability Requirements: If you anticipate web-scale traffic or need to handle big data, NoSQL is built to distribute data across nodes seamlessly. For example, a social network with millions of users or an IoT platform ingesting sensor data might favor a NoSQL solution that can scale horizontally with ease.
- Flexible or Evolving Data Model: Use NoSQL when you have unstructured or semi-structured data, or when each record might be a bit different. For instance, storing user profiles or documents where fields vary, or content that changes schema over time, is easier with a flexible document store than a rigid schema.
- High-Speed Reads/Writes: Many NoSQL databases are optimized for lightning-fast simple queries and writes. If your use case involves frequent inserts/updates (like logging events, real-time analytics, or caching results) and you don’t need complex joins, a NoSQL datastore can offer lower latency.
- Simple Transactions or None: If your application mostly deals with single-record operations (e.g., getting one document by ID, or updating one user’s preferences) and doesn’t require multi-record transactions, NoSQL will work well. You avoid the overhead of strict ACID compliance, gaining speed. (Some NoSQL databases do offer transaction support within a single item or document if needed.)
(For a deep dive into NoSQL strengths and use cases, read our NoSQL Databases in System Design Interviews: When to Use Them and Why article.)
Often, real-world systems use a mix: for example, using a relational database for core business data and a NoSQL database for caching, full-text search, or analytics. The key is to pick the right tool for each job. In a technical interview, explaining these trade-offs and the reasoning behind your choice is a great way to impress the interviewer and demonstrate sound system design thinking.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. What is the main difference between SQL and NoSQL databases? The main difference is how they structure data and enforce schema. SQL (relational) databases use structured tables with predefined schemas and relationships (ideal for structured data and multi-record transactions). NoSQL databases are non-relational, using flexible data models (documents, key-value, etc.) that handle unstructured data and scale horizontally.
Q2. When should I choose a NoSQL database over SQL? Use a NoSQL database when your application needs to handle massive scale or when your data is unstructured/varied. For example, if you expect millions of users or rapidly growing, changing datasets (like social media feeds, logs, or IoT data) and you don’t require complex multi-record transactions, NoSQL is a strong choice.
Q3. Are NoSQL databases faster than SQL databases? It depends on the use case. NoSQL databases can be faster for simple queries and huge volumes of data because they scale horizontally and avoid costly joins. For instance, fetching a document by key in a document store can be very fast. However, for complex queries (involving multiple tables or heavy aggregations), a well-tuned SQL database might perform better.
Q4. Do NoSQL databases support ACID transactions? Generally, NoSQL databases do not support full ACID transactions across multiple items like SQL databases do. Many NoSQL systems prioritize eventual consistency over strict transactions. Some NoSQL solutions (like newer versions of MongoDB) offer limited ACID support for single-document or small-scale transactions, but for complex multi-record transactions, a relational SQL database is usually preferred.
Conclusion
Both relational (SQL) and NoSQL databases have their place in modern system design. There is no one-size-fits-all answer – the best choice depends on your data’s structure, consistency needs, and scalability requirements. Often, relational databases shine for structured, consistent data and complex queries, while NoSQL solutions excel for flexibility and massive scale. Understanding the differences will help you make the right architectural decision and explain your rationale in an interview setting.
In summary, use the right tool for the right job. The good news is that you don’t have to strictly choose one over the other; many systems successfully use a mix of both. The key takeaway is to evaluate your use case’s needs (data model, scale, transactions) and choose a database approach that aligns with those needs.
Ready to dive deeper?
To build your skills, explore our courses like Grokking SQL for Tech Interviews and Grokking Relational Database Design and Modeling for Software Engineers. These courses offer in-depth lessons and mock interview practice, helping you master database design and confidently tackle system design or technical interview questions.
GET YOUR FREE
Coding Questions Catalog
