What is batch processing vs. stream processing and when should you use each?

In modern data systems, choosing between batch processing and stream processing is crucial. These two data processing models serve different needs. This article explains their differences with real-world examples and outlines when to use each. By the end, you’ll know which approach suits which scenario – a handy skill for system design and technical interviews.

What is Batch Processing?

Batch processing is a method of processing data where the system collects a large amount of input and processes it all at once. Instead of acting on every data point immediately, a batch system waits until enough data accumulates (or a scheduled time) and then processes the entire batch together. This approach optimizes throughput by handling many records in one go, but it introduces high latency – results are available only after the batch completes.

Examples of batch processing tasks:

• Nightly ETL jobs (Extract, Transform, Load) to update a data warehouse
• End-of-day bank transaction processing or weekly payroll runs

What is Stream Processing?

Stream processing is a data processing approach that handles data in real time, continuously as it arrives. Instead of waiting for batches, a stream processing system processes each data point (or small group of points) immediately. This results in low latency (insights within seconds or milliseconds), allowing systems to react almost instantly to incoming data. Stream processing is essential for applications that require up-to-the-second information and quick responses, though it often adds complexity to the system design.

Examples of stream processing tasks:

• Real-time fraud detection on credit card transactions (analyzing each transaction as it happens)
• Live tracking of sensor data (IoT metrics) or user activity, with dashboards updating continuously as new events occur

Batch Processing vs. Stream Processing: Key Differences

Both batch and stream processing handle large data, but they differ greatly in execution. Key differences include:

• Processing approach: Batch handles large volumes in sequential batches (often on a schedule), whereas stream processing continuously processes data as it comes in real time.
• Latency: Batch processing has higher latency because the system waits to accumulate data before processing. Stream processing provides results with minimal delay, often in near real time.
• Data scope: Batch jobs operate on entire datasets or large historical chunks of data at once, whereas stream processing focuses on current data in motion (e.g. a rolling window or latest events).
• System complexity: Batch pipelines are relatively simple (e.g. scheduled scripts or periodic jobs). Stream processing requires a more complex, always-on architecture with components like message queues (e.g. Apache Kafka) and stream processing engines to handle continuous input and ensure reliability (ordering, fault tolerance, etc.).

When to Use Batch Processing

Use batch processing when:

• Not time-sensitive (high-volume) tasks: If results can wait (minutes or hours) and you have large datasets to process (e.g. generating a sales report from millions of records the next day), batch processing is ideal.
• Scheduled intervals make sense: The job runs at regular periods (hourly, daily, weekly). Routine jobs like nightly backups, weekly payroll, or monthly billing are classic batch processes.
• Simplicity is a priority: If you want a simpler pipeline with fewer moving parts, batch fits. Batch jobs run on fixed datasets, reducing system complexity and points of failure.

When to Use Stream Processing

Use stream processing when:

• Real-time processing is required: You have strict low-latency requirements (for instance fraud detection or live user analytics) and need to process data within seconds. Stream processing excels in these scenarios by handling each event immediately.
• Data arrives continuously: The input is a constant stream (sensor readings, user clicks, log events) and you need to process events on the fly to keep information current. Streaming is ideal for such event-driven applications and live monitoring.

Conclusion

Choosing between batch processing and stream processing is about using the right tool for the task. Batch processing works best for big-picture analysis and scheduled jobs where latency isn’t critical, while stream processing excels in real-time scenarios that demand instant action. Many systems combine both approaches to leverage each of their strengths.

Batch vs. stream processing is a common topic in system design interviews – understanding these trade-offs is a valuable skill. In mock interviews, practice explaining the key differences and choosing the approach that fits the requirements.

DesignGurus.io is the go-to platform for mastering system design and data systems – sign up for our Grokking Modern AI Fundamentals course to deepen your understanding.

FAQs