What is NewSQL and how does it differ from traditional SQL and NoSQL databases?

In the evolving landscape of database technologies, a new category called NewSQL has emerged to bridge the gap between traditional SQL databases and modern NoSQL systems. But what is NewSQL, and how does it stack up in the SQL vs NoSQL vs NewSQL debate? This comprehensive guide will explain NewSQL in simple terms, highlight key differences from traditional SQL and NoSQL databases, and provide real-world examples. By the end, you’ll understand where NewSQL fits in system architecture design and gain insights useful for technical interview preparation and mock interview practice.

Traditional SQL Databases (Relational Databases)

Traditional SQL databases are relational database management systems (RDBMS) that have been around for decades. They store data in structured tables with predefined schemas (columns and data types), and they use SQL (Structured Query Language) for defining and manipulating data. SQL databases prioritize data integrity and follow ACID properties – Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability – which ensure reliable transactions (for example, a bank transfer either fully completes or fully fails, with no half-completed state). Because of their design, SQL databases excel at complex queries and joins across tables, making them ideal for structured data and scenarios that require strict consistency (such as financial systems or inventory management).

However, traditional SQL databases often scale vertically – meaning if you need to handle more load, you typically use a bigger, more powerful server. While some relational databases can be distributed or clustered, scaling them out horizontally (adding many servers) isn’t as seamless as with newer systems. This can become a limitation for very large-scale applications like social networks or big web services. Additionally, rigid schemas make evolving the data model slower in agile environments (you must alter table schemas to accommodate changes). These constraints led architects to explore alternatives when extremely high throughput, flexibility, and scaling across many servers became necessary.

(For a deeper dive into relational vs non-relational databases, see our post on SQL vs NoSQL: Key Differences.)

NoSQL Databases (Non-Relational Databases)

[NoSQL](https://www.designgurus.io/blog/no-slq-database databases were born in the mid-2000s to tackle the scaling and flexibility challenges that relational SQL databases faced. “NoSQL” essentially means “Not Only SQL,” reflecting that these systems do not use the traditional table-and-SQL model. Instead, NoSQL databases use a variety of data models: key–value stores, document stores (JSON-like documents), wide-column stores, graph databases, etc. They are typically schema-free or schema-flexible, allowing you to store unstructured or semi-structured data without a fixed table schema. This makes development more agile – new fields or data formats can be added on the fly.

The biggest strength of NoSQL is horizontal scalability. NoSQL systems are designed to distribute data across many commodity servers, so they can handle huge volumes of data and high traffic by scaling out rather than up. For example, companies like Google and Amazon pioneered distributed data stores (Bigtable, Dynamo) that inspired open-source NoSQL systems like Cassandra and MongoDB. With features like sharding (partitioning data by key across nodes) and replication, NoSQL databases can grow to web-scale sizes easily.

This scalability often comes with a trade-off in consistency. Many NoSQL databases relax the strict ACID guarantees to achieve high availability and performance. Instead, they follow an “eventual consistency” model as part of the BASE philosophy (Basically Available, Soft state, Eventual consistency). In practice, this means updates propagate to all nodes over time, but reads might see slightly stale data in the short term. For certain use cases – like social media feeds or analytics – this is acceptable. However, for use cases requiring absolute consistency (e.g. banking transactions), eventual consistency is a drawback. NoSQL systems also often lack support for complex join queries, since they favor denormalized data (storing data in a way that queries don’t need joins). Each NoSQL database is optimized for specific use cases: for instance, document databases are great for content management, and key–value stores excel at caching and real-time lookups.

What Is NewSQL?

NewSQL is a class of modern databases that aim to combine the best of both SQL and NoSQL worlds. In academic terms, “NewSQL is a class of modern relational DBMS that provide the same scalable performance of NoSQL systems for online transaction processing (OLTP) workloads while still maintaining the ACID guarantees of a traditional database system.” In other words, NewSQL systems retain the relational model and SQL query language of traditional databases, but they are designed to scale out horizontally and handle high throughput like NoSQL systems. Essentially, NewSQL brings NoSQL’s scalability to SQL databases without sacrificing consistency and transactions.

NewSQL databases became a hot topic in the 2010s as organizations wanted to handle massive traffic (Big Data/OLTP) but also needed strong consistency and the familiarity of SQL. A NewSQL system uses distributed architectures (like clustering, sharding, and replication across nodes) and sometimes novel algorithms (e.g. distributed consensus for transactions) to achieve this. One industry source nicely summarizes that NewSQL “combines the ACID guarantees of SQL-based relational engines with the horizontal scalability of NoSQL systems.”

Key characteristics of NewSQL:

• Relational and ACID-compliant: NewSQL databases use a relational data model (tables, rows, schemas) and support full ACID transactions. You can usually use standard SQL queries. This means developers can leverage familiar SQL syntax and guarantee consistency for each transaction (no more worrying about inconsistent reads that you might see in eventually consistent systems).
• Horizontally Scalable: NewSQL systems are built to scale across multiple servers or nodes. They often employ techniques like sharding (data partitioning) and distributed consensus (such as the Paxos or Raft algorithms) to ensure all nodes agree on data changes. This allows them to handle very high rates of concurrent transactions and large data volumes, akin to NoSQL, but with consistency. For example, if one node goes down, others can take over with up-to-date data, and you can add more nodes to increase capacity.
• High Performance for OLTP: Many NewSQL databases are optimized for online transaction processing workloads — think of scenarios like processing thousands of retail checkout transactions per second or handling a globally distributed user base with consistent account data. NewSQL shines in use cases where you need both speed and consistency at scale (e.g. financial trading systems, global inventory systems, realtime multiplayer gaming backends, etc.).
• Automatic Replication and Fault Tolerance: Like NoSQL systems, NewSQL solutions replicate data across nodes for fault tolerance and read scalability. But they typically do so with strong consistency—ensuring that a committed transaction is durably stored and replicated to other nodes immediately. If a node fails, another node has the same data to take over, without data loss.

Even though NewSQL is a newer approach (and the term “NewSQL” itself hints that it’s new SQL), it’s gaining traction for cloud-native applications. It effectively “found the sweet spot between speed, scalability, consistency, and availability,” offering a reliable solution for big data and high-volume transactional apps. Many NewSQL databases are open-source or come from innovative tech companies and academic research.

Examples of NewSQL Databases: NewSQL is a broad category, and several database systems fall under this umbrella:

• Google Spanner – Google Spanner is a pioneering NewSQL database designed by Google. It’s a globally distributed, strongly consistent database that uses special time-synchronization (TrueTime) and the Paxos algorithm to achieve horizontal scale with ACID transactions. Spanner (available as Cloud Spanner on Google Cloud) proved it’s possible to have global scale SQL databases without giving up consistency.
• CockroachDB – CockroachDB is an open-source NewSQL database inspired by Spanner. It automatically shards data and replicates it across nodes (even across data centers) and presents a SQL interface. CockroachDB is fault-tolerant (the name comes from being as resilient as a cockroach) and aims to let you “write SQL, scale globally” with strong consistency.
• VoltDB – VoltDB is an in-memory NewSQL database (initially architected by database veteran Michael Stonebraker). It is designed for extremely fast OLTP performance, using an in-memory storage engine and partitioning data across many nodes. VoltDB guarantees ACID transactions and is ideal for scenarios like financial trading, telecommunication billing, or any use case requiring millisecond responses for thousands of concurrent transactions.
• SingleStore (MemSQL) – SingleStore (formerly called MemSQL) is another NewSQL offering that started as an in-memory, distributed SQL database. It combines SQL querying with a scale-out architecture and can handle both transactional and analytical workloads in one system. It’s used in real-time analytics and dashboard systems where fast queries on fresh data are needed.
• NuoDB – NuoDB is a NewSQL database that uses a layered architecture with in-memory processing and disk storage, aiming to scale out on cloud environments while appearing as a single logical SQL database. It’s known for a unique design that can add or remove nodes on the fly and still maintain ACID consistency.

(There are several other NewSQL or “distributed SQL” databases, including Amazon Aurora, YugabyteDB, TiDB, FaunaDB, etc., each with their own approach. The key commonality is SQL with scalability.)

SQL vs NoSQL vs NewSQL: Key Differences

Now that we’ve defined each type, let’s compare SQL vs NoSQL vs NewSQL directly. Each of these database approaches has its own strengths and ideal use cases. Here are the key differences at a glance:

• Data Model & Schema: Traditional SQL databases use a relational model – data is organized in tables with fixed schemas and relationships (foreign keys). NoSQL databases use flexible data models – for example, documents or key-value pairs – and are generally schema-less (you can store different fields in each record). NewSQL databases stick to the relational model (tables and schemas) to leverage SQL’s power. This means NewSQL requires structured schemas like SQL, though some NewSQL systems may support semi-structured data types (e.g. JSON columns) as part of their SQL extensions. If your data is highly relational and structured, SQL/NewSQL handle it naturally, whereas NoSQL lets you store varied, evolving data more flexibly.

• Scalability & Architecture: SQL (RDBMS) typically scales vertically – you increase capacity by using a bigger server or high-end hardware. There are clustering solutions for SQL, but they can be complex and not as elastic. NoSQL was built for horizontal scaling – it runs on clusters of many cheap servers, automatically distributing data. This allows near-unlimited scale-out for big data or high traffic. NewSQL also provides horizontal scalability (distributed across nodes) but with the important difference that it maintains a single, logical relational database. NewSQL achieves scale via sharding and distributed processing under the hood, so it can grow without the single-node bottleneck, all while appearing to the user as one database system. In short, both NoSQL and NewSQL are designed to scale out across machines, but NewSQL does so without giving up the relational paradigm.

• Consistency & Transactions: SQL databases prioritize consistency – multi-row transactions and complex queries are fully supported, and once a transaction commits, all reads see that change. They adhere to ACID strictly. NoSQL databases often sacrifice immediate consistency for availability and speed. Many use BASE semantics (eventual consistency), meaning they might not guarantee that all copies of data are updated at once. This is fine for use cases where occasional slight delays in synchronization are acceptable. NewSQL preserves strong consistency and ACID transactions even in a distributed setup. NewSQL databases are designed to ensure that transactions commit atomically and data is consistent across nodes as if it were a single server. This makes NewSQL attractive for applications like financial systems or order processing, where you can’t afford anomalies in data (something that pure NoSQL might risk under certain conditions).

• Query Capabilities: SQL systems use the powerful SQL language, allowing complex JOINs, aggregations, and subqueries across tables. This makes them very versatile for querying relationships in data. NoSQL systems vary in query capability – some provide limited query languages or simple key-based lookups only. For example, a document store might let you query on fields within a document, but it won’t easily join two collections like an SQL JOIN. Reporting and analytics across different data in NoSQL can require additional processing. NewSQL databases support SQL queries, including joins and complex logic, just like traditional RDBMS. In NewSQL, you can use familiar SQL syntax to retrieve and manipulate data, even though behind the scenes the data may be distributed across servers. This means you get the expressiveness of SQL along with the scale; for developers and analysts, this is a big advantage of NewSQL over NoSQL.

• Use Cases & Examples: SQL databases are best for structured data and scenarios that demand absolute consistency or complex querying of relationships. They power many existing systems like banking systems, ERP software, and smaller-scale web apps. NoSQL databases are suited for use cases requiring massive scale, flexible schema, and high write/read throughput – for example, real-time analytics, IoT data streams, content management with varying data, or caching user sessions. They are often used in big tech (social networks, large e-commerce sites) where scaling out and handling unstructured data is crucial. NewSQL databases are ideal when you need both: the **guaranteed consistency and expressiveness of SQL, and the scalability of NoSQL. Real-world examples include large financial institutions adopting NewSQL for trading platforms, online retailers using NewSQL to maintain inventory across global warehouses in real time, or SaaS applications that must handle thousands of concurrent transactions without data loss. NewSQL is still relatively new and evolving, but it’s increasingly chosen for modern cloud architectures where developers want to leverage SQL with cloud-scale performance. As one source puts it, NewSQL “ticks all the right boxes” by hitting a balance of speed, scalability and reliability.

In summary, SQL vs NoSQL vs NewSQL is not about declaring a winner – it’s about choosing the right tool for the job. Traditional SQL databases offer reliability and maturity, NoSQL offers flexibility and scale, and NewSQL offers an appealing middle ground for certain high-demand applications.

Conclusion – Choosing the Right Database & Next Steps

Modern architects and developers now have a spectrum of database choices. If your application needs strict consistency, structured schema, and support for complex queries, a tried-and-true SQL database might suffice. If you’re dealing with big data or need massive horizontal scaling with flexible data models, a NoSQL solution could be the answer despite its relaxed consistency. And if you find yourself needing the best of both worlds – global scale-out without giving up SQL and ACID guarantees – then NewSQL databases might be the perfect fit. NewSQL is essentially filling the gap for companies that require the reliability of relational databases but can’t live with the old scaling limits.

Each approach has its nuances, and in real-world system architecture you might even use them in combination (for example, using a NewSQL or SQL database for core transactional data and a NoSQL database for caching or analytics). The key is to understand the trade-offs and strengths of each.

Ready to deepen your SQL skills and ace that tech interview or system design discussion? Join our course Grokking SQL for Tech Interviews to practice real-world SQL problems and learn how to tackle database questions in technical interviews. Mastering SQL and understanding when to use SQL vs NoSQL vs NewSQL will give you an edge in your next interview and in designing robust systems. Sign up today and take the next step in your career!

FAQs