Concurrency vs Parallelism: Why They're Not the Same Thing
In programming, "concurrency" and "parallelism" often get used interchangeably, but they aren't the same thing. This post demystifies these two concepts with simple language and real-life examples. By the end, you'll know what each term really means, how they differ, and why knowing the difference matters for writing efficient software.
Imagine you're a barista handling orders. You take one customer’s order, then move to the next, switching back and forth between tasks—this is concurrency.
Now imagine you and a coworker each make a different drink at the same time—that’s parallelism.
Sounds similar, but they solve very different problems.
In software and system design, concurrency and parallelism often get lumped together, but they’re not the same.
One is about managing lots of things at once; the other is about doing lots of things at once.
In this blog, we’ll explore what makes them different, when to use each, and why understanding both is key to building fast, responsive systems—and acing your system design interviews.
Let's break down what sets these terms apart.
What is Concurrency?
Concurrency is essentially about handling multiple tasks at once (or giving the illusion of doing so).
On a single-core CPU, true simultaneous execution isn't possible, so concurrency is achieved by rapidly switching between tasks.
For example, your laptop can play music while you write code; the CPU alternates between these tasks (time-slicing) so quickly that it feels like they're happening together.
A popular saying goes: "Concurrency is about dealing with lots of things at once; parallelism is about doing lots of things at once."
The subtle difference in phrasing ("dealing with" vs "doing") highlights that concurrency is about structure and coordination – allowing a program to make progress on multiple tasks without having to finish one before starting the next.
Even with one CPU core, concurrency can make a system feel like it's multitasking.
Why Use Concurrency?
The main reason is to keep programs responsive.
If one task is blocked waiting on I/O, another task can run in the meantime so the CPU isn't idle.
Concurrency is great for I/O-heavy or user-interactive scenarios, where many things are happening and you don't want one slow operation to freeze everything.
By overlapping tasks, concurrency maximizes CPU utilization.
Check out Grokking Multithreading and Concurrency for Coding Interviews.
What is Parallelism?
Parallelism is about literally doing multiple things at the same time. This requires hardware that can execute tasks simultaneously – for instance, multiple CPU cores.
If concurrency is one cook multitasking, parallelism is hiring several cooks to work side by side on different tasks, finishing the job faster.
In computing terms, parallelism means splitting work into independent pieces that run at the same time.
For example, on a 4-core machine, a job divided into 4 parts could finish roughly four times faster.
The primary goal of parallelism is to speed up processing by using multiple processors at once.
Note that just writing a multi-threaded program doesn't guarantee parallelism.
If those threads run on a single-core machine, they still execute one at a time (concurrently via context switching, but not truly in parallel).
True parallelism happens only when you have at least two cores working simultaneously.
When Is Parallelism Useful?
Especially for CPU-bound tasks – heavy computations or data processing. Using multiple cores can significantly reduce the execution time for such work.
In short, parallelism is all about speeding up processing by doing lots of work simultaneously.
Concurrency vs Parallelism: Key Differences
Both concurrency and parallelism involve multiple tasks, but they work differently:
-
True Simultaneity: Concurrency means tasks overlap in time but aren't necessarily simultaneous. Parallelism means tasks run at the same time, which requires multiple cores.
-
Purpose & Use Cases: Concurrency improves throughput by doing other work while waiting (ideal for I/O-bound tasks). Parallelism improves processing speed by using multiple cores at once (ideal for CPU-bound tasks).
-
Relationship: All parallel tasks are concurrent (they occur in the same period), but not all concurrent tasks are parallel. You can have concurrency without parallelism when tasks are interleaved on a single core.
Many real systems use both techniques.
For example, a web server might handle many requests concurrently (so one slow request doesn't block others) and also leverage a multi-core CPU to process some of them in parallel for higher throughput.
Understanding the difference helps you choose the right approach – use concurrency to keep applications responsive, and use parallelism to crunch more work at once if you have multiple cores.
Check out concurrency and parallelism interview questions.
Wrapping Up
Concurrency and parallelism are concepts that every developer (especially those prepping for interviews) should understand.
In summary, concurrency is about managing multiple tasks at once (often by quickly switching between them), whereas parallelism is about executing multiple tasks at the exact same time.
Most real-world systems use a mix of both.
Knowing how they differ will help you communicate clearly and make better decisions when building software.
Happy learning, and happy coding!
What our users say
Arijeet
Just completed the “Grokking the system design interview”. It's amazing and super informative. Have come across very few courses that are as good as this!
Ashley Pean
Check out Grokking the Coding Interview. Instead of trying out random Algos, they break down the patterns you need to solve them. Helps immensely with retention!
Nathan Thomas
My newest course recommendation for all of you is to check out Grokking the System Design Interview on designgurus.io. I'm working through it this month, and I'd highly recommend it.
