On This Page

What is a Graph Database?

Graph vs Relational vs Document Databases

When Do Graph Databases Shine?

When to Stick with Relational or Other Databases

Conclusion

FAQs

Image
Arslan Ahmad

Graph Databases 101: When to Use Neo4j or Graph DBs

SQL or Neo4j? If your data is full of relationships, Neo4j might be the answer. Check out 2 clear signs you need a graph database, plus a quick comparison of relational vs graph vs document databases.
Image
On this page

What is a Graph Database?

Graph vs Relational vs Document Databases

When Do Graph Databases Shine?

When to Stick with Relational or Other Databases

Conclusion

FAQs

This blog explains what graph databases are, how they differ from relational and other NoSQL databases, and when to use them versus sticking with traditional relational or document-based solutions.

Imagine building a new social network and watching your SQL database struggle with “friends-of-friends” queries.

That’s where a graph database shines.

Graph databases (like Neo4j) specialize in handling highly connected data, treating relationships as first-class citizens.

In this guide, we’ll demystify graph databases (using Neo4j as an example) and explain when to choose a graph model over a relational or other NoSQL database.

By the end, you’ll know where graph databases excel and where they’re overkill – and you’ll be ready to explain your reasoning in interviews!

What is a Graph Database?

A graph database is a NoSQL database that stores data as a network of nodes (entities) and edges (relationships) instead of tables.

Nodes hold data (like a customer or product), and edges represent connections between nodes (e.g. Customer A BOUGHT Product X). Neo4j, a leading graph database, keeps these relationships as part of the data model, so it can traverse connections directly without needing costly JOIN lookups.

By contrast, a relational database uses tables, and relationships are implied via foreign keys that are resolved at query time with JOINs.

For example, to find all of Alice’s friends in SQL, the system must join a Friendships table with the Users table on Alice’s ID, then join back to Users to get each friend’s details.

As the web of relationships deepens (friends-of-friends, etc.), these JOINs multiply and slow down.

A graph database like Neo4j avoids that overhead – Alice’s friends are stored as direct links to her node, so a query can simply follow those connections, maintaining speed even as data grows.

Other NoSQL databases (document stores, key-value stores, etc.) also move beyond tables but don’t handle complex interconnections natively.

A document database (e.g. MongoDB) stores flexible JSON records, but linking one document to another isn’t seamless and often requires duplicating data or extra queries.

Key-value stores excel at simple get-by-key operations but have no built-in notion of relationships between entries.

If your problem is all about connections, a graph database handles that directly, whereas other databases either ignore relationships or make you manage them in your application.

Graph vs Relational vs Document Databases

AspectGraph Database (Neo4j)Relational Database (SQL)Document Database (NoSQL)
Data Model & SchemaNodes & edges; flexible schema.Tables (rows/columns); fixed schema (predefined).JSON documents; flexible schema.
Relationship HandlingRelationships stored directly. Multi-hop queries are fast (no expensive JOINs).Relationships via foreign keys. Requires JOINs (gets slower with complex joins).No joins; usually denormalize or link in app logic (not ideal for complex ties).
Best Use CasesSocial networks, recommendations, fraud detection.Transactional/structured data (financial, inventory) with clear schema and few many-to-many links.Content management, user profiles, catalogs – mostly self-contained data.

(Graph databases are a category of NoSQL. Here “document database” stands in for other non-graph NoSQL types.)

When Do Graph Databases Shine?

Use Neo4j or another graph DB when:

  • Your data is highly connected: If you have lots of many-to-many relationships and need to traverse them quickly, a graph database is ideal. In a social network, for example, finding connections several hops away (friends-of-friends) is straightforward with a graph, whereas doing the same in SQL would require multiple JOINs. Recommendation engines similarly benefit, since you can hop through user–item relationships directly instead of writing complex join queries.

  • You need to spot patterns in networks: Graph databases are great for analyzing connected structures. In fraud detection, for instance, a graph can reveal that Account A is indirectly linked to Account B through a chain of intermediaries – a connection that might be hidden in a traditional relational setup. Graph queries make it easier to uncover such indirect links in fraud rings or to map complex networks (like IT infrastructure), where relationships among nodes are the key.

When to Stick with Relational or Other Databases

On the other hand, choose a traditional relational or non-graph database when:

  • Your data isn’t relationship-heavy (or needs simple access): If records in your dataset mostly stand alone, or if you mainly need simple lookups by an ID, a graph database would be overkill. A simple inventory, a blogging platform (posts with comments), or any scenario where one-to-many or few-to-none relationships suffice can be handled efficiently by SQL or document databases. These solutions will be simpler and often faster for data that isn’t deeply interconnected.

  • You have high transaction volumes or strict consistency needs: When dealing with a large number of transactions or very structured data, relational databases shine. They provide strong ACID consistency and have decades of optimization for transaction processing (think banking systems or order management). If you need to enforce complex constraints or update lots of records rapidly, an SQL database will usually handle it better than a graph database.

Conclusion

Graph databases like Neo4j excel at handling connected data, but they’re not one-size-fits-all.

Relational and document databases still dominate for structured, transactional, or mostly self-contained information.

The key is to use a graph model when relationships are at the heart of your data’s value, and use relational/other NoSQL databases when they are not.

FAQs

Q: What is a graph database, and how is it different from a relational database?
A graph database stores data as connected nodes and relationships instead of tables. For example, Neo4j can store that Alice is friends with Bob as a direct link. In a relational database, you’d have separate tables for people and their friendships and then use JOIN queries to connect them. By eliminating JOINs, graph databases make querying relationships faster and more intuitive.

Q: When should I use a graph database like Neo4j instead of SQL?

Use a graph database when your data is highly interconnected or involves complex relationship queries. If you have lots of many-to-many connections – think social networks, recommendation engines, fraud investigations – a graph database will handle those queries more efficiently than a SQL database (which would need many JOINs). However, if your data is mostly tabular or requires strict transactions (e.g. financial records), a relational database is likely the better choice.

Q: Is Neo4j a NoSQL database, and what makes it special?
Yes. Neo4j is a NoSQL database – specifically a graph database – because it doesn’t use tables. Instead, Neo4j stores information in nodes and edges and uses a query language (Cypher) to navigate those connections. This lets Neo4j efficiently handle queries about relationships that would be hard to perform with a traditional SQL database

System Design Interview

What our users say

MO JAFRI

The courses which have "grokking" before them, are exceptionally well put together! These courses magically condense 3 years of CS in short bite-size courses and lectures (I have tried System Design, OODI, and Coding patterns). The Grokking courses are godsent, to be honest.

Eric

I've completed my first pass of "grokking the System Design Interview" and I can say this was an excellent use of money and time. I've grown as a developer and now know the secrets of how to build these really giant internet systems.

Roger Cruz

The world gets better inch by inch when you help someone else. If you haven't tried Grokking The Coding Interview, check it out, it's a great resource!

More From Designgurus
Image
One-Stop Portal For Tech Interviews.
Copyright © 2025 Design Gurus, LLC. All rights reserved.