On this page
PostgreSQL and the Relational Model
Structuring Data in Tables
What Happens Behind the Scenes
Accelerating Data Retrieval
Scaling Relational Databases
MongoDB and the Document Model
How MongoDB Stores Data
Storing Nested Information
What Happens Behind the Scenes
Scaling Document Databases
DynamoDB and the Key Value Model
Fully Managed Infrastructure
The Key Value Architecture
What Happens Behind the Scenes
Scaling Serverless Databases
Making the Right Architectural Choice
Conclusion
PostgreSQL vs. MongoDB vs. DynamoDB
On This Page
PostgreSQL and the Relational Model
Structuring Data in Tables
What Happens Behind the Scenes
Accelerating Data Retrieval
Scaling Relational Databases
MongoDB and the Document Model
How MongoDB Stores Data
Storing Nested Information
What Happens Behind the Scenes
Scaling Document Databases
DynamoDB and the Key Value Model
Fully Managed Infrastructure
The Key Value Architecture
What Happens Behind the Scenes
Scaling Serverless Databases
Making the Right Architectural Choice
Conclusion
Software applications continuously process massive volumes of digital information.
When a platform experiences a sudden spike in network traffic, the underlying storage system often buckles under the immense pressure. Slow data processing leads to unresponsive software, and complete database crashes cause catastrophic information loss. Solving this structural bottleneck requires selecting the optimal database architecture before writing any code.
Understanding how different databases organize and distribute data is critical for building resilient systems.
A database is not just a static data container. It is a complex software engine that fundamentally dictates how an application can grow. If the foundational data layer is poorly designed, simply adding more computing power will never solve the root latency issues.
Let us examine how a database operates behind the scenes. It receives incoming data, validates its format, and finds a physical location on the computer hard drive to save it. When an application requests that data later, the database engine must search the hard drive, retrieve the specific information, and send it back over the network.
If the database must scan the entire hard drive sequentially to find one record, the process takes too long. Different database architectures solve this searching and storing problem using unique mathematical structures.
For example, a relational database uses strict index trees, while a key value store uses mathematical hashing functions to pinpoint data instantly.
We must evaluate these structural differences to ensure the software can handle exponential data growth gracefully.
PostgreSQL and the Relational Model
PostgreSQL is a highly advanced open source relational database. It is widely considered the absolute standard for data accuracy and structural integrity. In a relational database, data is organized into a rigid grid of columns and rows.
This mathematical structure is heavily optimized for complex queries and deeply connected data. It forces software teams to map out exactly how data relates before writing any application code.
Let us explore how it manages this data securely.
Structuring Data in Tables
Before saving any data, developers must define a strict schema.
A schema is a mandatory blueprint outlining exactly what type of data belongs in every single column.
If a column is designed specifically for integer numbers, the database automatically rejects any text inputs.
This rigidity guarantees that all saved information remains perfectly organized and entirely predictable. Developers connect different tables using foreign keys.
A foreign key is a strict logical link between a row in one table and a row in another table.
For instance, a user profile table can link directly to an order history table using a specific identification number.
This allows code to fetch combined data from multiple tables using a command called a Join.
A Join seamlessly merges the related rows into one unified result.
What Happens Behind the Scenes
PostgreSQL prioritizes absolute data safety through ACID compliance.
ACID stands for Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability. These strict rules guarantee that complex database operations never save partially broken data.
If a multi step update fails halfway through, the database cancels the entire operation automatically.
To achieve this extreme durability, PostgreSQL utilizes a Write-Ahead Log.
Before the database writes new data to the main storage tables, it records the exact changes in a secure sequential file.
If the server suddenly loses power, the database reads this log upon restarting. It safely reconstructs any unsaved changes to prevent data corruption.
Accelerating Data Retrieval
PostgreSQL uses a specialized internal structure called a B-Tree index to accelerate search operations. Without an index, the database must scan every single row to find a specific record. Scanning entire disks consumes enormous computing power and dramatically slows down response times.
A B-Tree index mathematically sorts the data into a hierarchical tree shape.
At the very top, a root node evaluates the search request and points to a specific branch. The database navigates down these branches, eliminating large portions of irrelevant data at every step.
Finally, it reaches a leaf node at the bottom, which contains the exact physical disk location of the requested record. This targeted navigation reduces search times from minutes to mere milliseconds.
Scaling Relational Databases
Scaling a relational database is inherently difficult. Because the tables are tightly linked by strict foreign keys, spreading the data across multiple physical servers breaks the mathematical relationships. Therefore, PostgreSQL relies heavily on vertical scaling.
Vertical scaling involves upgrading a single central server with faster processors and larger memory modules. Eventually, physical hardware limitations restrict how much a single machine can handle. At this point, engineering teams must implement complex replication strategies to keep the system online.
MongoDB and the Document Model
MongoDB is a highly popular database belonging to the NoSQL category.
NoSQL means the system completely abandons the traditional concepts of strict tables and rows. Instead, MongoDB prioritizes structural flexibility and rapid horizontal growth.
It stores data in independent, flexible entities known as documents.
This architecture is highly effective for rapidly evolving software systems where data requirements change frequently. We can see how this benefits agile development teams.
How MongoDB Stores Data
MongoDB groups these documents together inside larger containers called collections. The documents themselves are formatted in BSON, which stands for Binary JavaScript Object Notation.
This compressed format allows developers to store complex, nested data structures natively.
A single document can contain lists, plain text, and even other smaller documents embedded directly inside it. The most defining feature of MongoDB is its flexible schema design.
A collection does not require every document to share the exact same structural layout.
One document might contain exactly five fields of information. Another document in the identical collection might contain twelve completely different fields.
This allows software teams to update their code quickly without rewriting database blueprints or executing slow migration scripts.
Storing Nested Information
By embedding related data directly inside one document, MongoDB eliminates the need for complex Joins.
If an application needs a user profile and recent actions, all that information lives inside one single document.
This concept is known as data locality.
When the application requests a record, the database simply fetches the single document from the hard drive. This makes reading complex hierarchical data incredibly fast and computationally efficient. The database engine does not need to perform internal mathematical lookups across different storage blocks.
What Happens Behind the Scenes
MongoDB manages internal data processing using a software component called the WiredTiger storage engine.
This engine heavily utilizes the computer memory to cache new data before permanently writing it to the physical disk. This memory caching makes data insertion incredibly fast.
To prevent data loss during hardware failures, MongoDB uses Replica Sets.
A replica set is a cluster of servers that maintain identical copies of the database. One server acts as the primary node to process all incoming writes.
If this primary node crashes unexpectedly, the secondary nodes instantly communicate and elect a new primary node. This automated failover process happens in seconds, minimizing overall system downtime and keeping applications functional.
Scaling Document Databases
Unlike relational systems, MongoDB is explicitly engineered for horizontal scaling.
Horizontal scaling means adding more standard servers to the network to share the overall workload. MongoDB achieves this infinite growth through an architectural process called sharding.
Sharding automatically slices a massive dataset into smaller logical chunks. The system then distributes these chunks across dozens of independent physical servers. To do this, engineers must define a shard key within the documents.
A background routing server evaluates this specific key and directs incoming data to the exact physical server assigned to hold it.
For example, if the shard key is a user location, the system might route all European user documents to one specific server.
This allows the system to process virtually unlimited write operations as long as more servers are added to the cluster.
DynamoDB and the Key Value Model
DynamoDB is a fully managed proprietary NoSQL database created by Amazon Web Services. It functions entirely as a key-value store.
This represents the absolute simplest and fastest form of database architecture available.
Every distinct piece of data is paired directly with a highly unique identifier. The system is strictly optimized for retrieving discrete items using their exact unique identifier.
Let us analyze why this simplicity creates such incredible speed.
Fully Managed Infrastructure
Because DynamoDB is a managed cloud service, engineers never touch the underlying servers.
The cloud provider handles all hardware installations, security patches, and network configurations automatically. Software teams simply create a table via an interface and start writing data.
This fully serverless design drastically reduces operational maintenance.
The database automatically provisions the exact amount of hardware required to handle the incoming network traffic. Teams can focus entirely on writing application code rather than managing infrastructure.
The Key Value Architecture
When creating a table, developers must define a partition key.
This key is the absolute foundation of the entire DynamoDB architecture. Every single item saved to the database must possess this specific unique key.
The database does not enforce any strict schemas on the remaining data payload attached to this key. Applications simply provide the exact key, and the database instantly returns the associated value.
DynamoDB does not support complex queries, table joins, or advanced filtering operations natively.
Because the query capabilities are severely restricted, the performance remains absolutely predictable. Fetching a record from a table containing one hundred items takes the exact same amount of time as fetching a record from a table containing ten billion items.
What Happens Behind the Scenes
DynamoDB achieves these predictable speeds through consistent hashing.
A partition is a tiny isolated slice of storage space located on a massive server farm. When code saves an item, the database extracts the partition key and processes it through a mathematical hash function.
A hash function is a strict mathematical algorithm that converts the key into a unique numerical value. The output of this mathematical hash instantly identifies the exact physical server assigned to store the data. The database never scans tables or traverses complex index trees.
It simply runs the fast calculation and fetches the block of data directly.
This direct mathematical addressing guarantees single digit millisecond response times, regardless of the total data volume.
DynamoDB also automatically duplicates all data across three geographically separate data centers for maximum safety.
Scaling Serverless Databases
Scaling in DynamoDB requires zero manual intervention from the engineering team. Developers simply set their desired read and write capacity targets.
As incoming traffic surges during peak hours, the internal system continuously monitors the workload.
It automatically splits busy partitions and provisions extra servers entirely behind the scenes. When the traffic subsides, the database automatically scales down the internal capacity to save operational costs. The application code never knows that the physical storage layout changed.
Making the Right Architectural Choice
System design requires engineers to rigorously evaluate the technical trade offs of different storage mechanisms.
No single database architecture is perfectly suited for every possible software requirement.
The correct choice depends entirely on how the application intends to format, write, and read its data.
If the application requires absolute mathematical accuracy and highly structured data, PostgreSQL remains the superior choice. Its strict schema enforcement physically prevents incompatible data from corrupting the system.
The comprehensive ACID compliance provides absolute data integrity for systems requiring complex transactional safety.
If the software project requires rapid development cycles and flexible data structures, MongoDB excels. Its ability to store unstructured, nested documents allows teams to evolve their applications without database downtime. The built in sharding mechanisms provide a straightforward path to horizontal scaling when traffic increases.
If the application demands predictable, ultra fast latency at a massive scale, DynamoDB is the definitive option. It removes all server management burdens and scales infinitely without manual intervention.
It is the correct choice when applications need to perform massive volumes of simple, key based lookups.
Conclusion
Understanding the mechanical differences between data storage architectures is a fundamental requirement for software engineering.
The initial database decision dictates the entire technical trajectory of a project.
- PostgreSQL enforces rigid schemas and organizes data into structured relational tables.
- PostgreSQL utilizes mathematical joins for complex queries and guarantees strict ACID compliance.
- MongoDB stores information in flexible, hierarchical BSON documents instead of rigid rows.
- MongoDB achieves massive scale by horizontally sharding data across multiple independent servers.
- DynamoDB functions as a fully managed, serverless key value storage engine.
- DynamoDB uses internal hashing functions to provide instant data retrieval at any scale.
- Selecting the optimal database depends entirely on understanding the specific system access patterns.
What our users say
Simon Barker
This is what I love about http://designgurus.io’s Grokking the coding interview course. They teach patterns rather than solutions.
Tonya Sims
DesignGurus.io "Grokking the Coding Interview". One of the best resources I’ve found for learning the major patterns behind solving coding problems.
ABHISHEK GUPTA
My offer from the top tech company would not have been possible without this course. Many thanks!!
Designgurus on Substack
Deep dives, systems design teardowns, and interview tactics delivered daily.
Access to 50+ courses
New content added monthly
Certificate of completion
$24.92
/month
Billed Annually
Recommended Course
Grokking the System Design Interview
164,733+ students
4.7
Grokking the System Design Interview is a comprehensive course for system design interview. It provides a step-by-step guide to answering system design questions.
View CourseRead More
Kafka Streams vs. Apache Flink vs. Apache Storm: Stream Processing Showdown
Arslan Ahmad
Scaling 101: Comprehensive Learning for Large System Designs
Arslan Ahmad
7 Must-Read System Design Papers to Ace Your Interview (2024 Edition)
Arslan Ahmad
Scaling SQL Databases: 8 Challenges of Horizontally Scaling SQL Databases
Arslan Ahmad
