On this page

How These Guides Are Organized

AI Labs and AI Infrastructure

Anthropic

OpenAI

xAI

Google DeepMind

Perplexity

Scale AI

Cursor (Anysphere)

Databricks

Mistral AI

Cohere

Hugging Face

ElevenLabs

Groq

Runway

Together AI

Cerebras

Glean

Sierra

Harvey

Thinking Machines Lab

Safe Superintelligence (SSI)

Mercor

Cognition

Decagon

Abridge

Physical Intelligence

Lovable

Baseten

Fireworks AI

Higgsfield

CoreWeave

Crusoe

Gimlet Labs

Nebius

Synthesia

Big Tech

Apple

Microsoft

Netflix

Nvidia

Tesla

Adobe

LinkedIn

Oracle

IBM

Intel

Cisco

Qualcomm

AMD

SAP

Consumer, Marketplace, and Commerce

Uber

Airbnb

DoorDash

Spotify

Shopify

TikTok and ByteDance

Reddit

Duolingo

Roblox

Discord

Walmart Global Tech

Pinterest

Snap

Instacart

Lyft

Booking.com

Expedia

eBay

Twitch

Epic Games

Unity

Flipkart

Swiggy

Zomato

Meesho

Zepto

Myntra

Dream11

Ola

Udaan

Deliveroo

Ocado Technology

Zalando

Allegro

CD Projekt Red

Mercado Libre

iFood

Grab

Shopee

Fintech and Quantitative Finance

Stripe

PayPal

Robinhood

Ramp

Citadel

Jane Street

Two Sigma

Bloomberg

Capital One

Intuit

Block (Square)

Chime

Plaid

Brex

Affirm

Klarna

Revolut

Nubank

Wise

Toast

Hudson River Trading

Jump Trading

D. E. Shaw

JPMorgan Chase

Goldman Sachs

Polymarket

Kalshi

Mercury

PhonePe

Razorpay

Paytm

CRED

Groww

Zerodha

Wealthsimple

RBC

Starling Bank

Commonwealth Bank

Airwallex

N26

Trade Republic

Developer Tools and Enterprise Software

GitHub

Atlassian

ServiceNow

Salesforce

Snowflake

Cloudflare

Figma

Notion

Canva

Vercel

Wiz

Workday

Rippling

MongoDB

Redis

GitLab

Confluent

HashiCorp

Docker

Elastic

Grafana Labs

Temporal

Supabase

Linear

Airtable

Miro

Slack

Twilio

Okta

Zoom

Dropbox

Zscaler

Palo Alto Networks

SentinelOne

Snyk

Deel

Gusto

Samsara

Factory AI

Replit

Modal

LangChain

Pinecone

Zoho

Freshworks

Postman

BrowserStack

HighRadius

Sprinklr

Defense and Frontier Tech

Anduril

Palantir

SpaceX

Waymo

Zoox

Neuralink

Rivian

Boston Dynamics

Figure AI

Applied Intuition

IT Services and Global Delivery

TCS

Infosys

Cognizant

Wipro

Accenture

Capgemini

HCLTech

Tech Mahindra

LTIMindtree

What These Loops Have in Common (and Where They Diverge)

FAQ

Full Interview Guides

Tech Company Interview Guides: How 198 Top Companies Interview

Image
Arslan Ahmad
Round-by-round interview guides for 198 top tech companies: what each loop looks like, what they screen for, and how to prepare.
Image

How These Guides Are Organized

AI Labs and AI Infrastructure

Anthropic

OpenAI

xAI

Google DeepMind

Perplexity

Scale AI

Cursor (Anysphere)

Databricks

Mistral AI

Cohere

Hugging Face

ElevenLabs

Groq

Runway

Together AI

Cerebras

Glean

Sierra

Harvey

Thinking Machines Lab

Safe Superintelligence (SSI)

Mercor

Cognition

Decagon

Abridge

Physical Intelligence

Lovable

Baseten

Fireworks AI

Higgsfield

CoreWeave

Crusoe

Gimlet Labs

Nebius

Synthesia

Big Tech

Apple

Microsoft

Netflix

Nvidia

Tesla

Adobe

LinkedIn

Oracle

IBM

Intel

Cisco

Qualcomm

AMD

SAP

Consumer, Marketplace, and Commerce

Uber

Airbnb

DoorDash

Spotify

Shopify

TikTok and ByteDance

Reddit

Duolingo

Roblox

Discord

Walmart Global Tech

Pinterest

Snap

Instacart

Lyft

Booking.com

Expedia

eBay

Twitch

Epic Games

Unity

Flipkart

Swiggy

Zomato

Meesho

Zepto

Myntra

Dream11

Ola

Udaan

Deliveroo

Ocado Technology

Zalando

Allegro

CD Projekt Red

Mercado Libre

iFood

Grab

Shopee

Fintech and Quantitative Finance

Stripe

PayPal

Robinhood

Ramp

Citadel

Jane Street

Two Sigma

Bloomberg

Capital One

Intuit

Block (Square)

Chime

Plaid

Brex

Affirm

Klarna

Revolut

Nubank

Wise

Toast

Hudson River Trading

Jump Trading

D. E. Shaw

JPMorgan Chase

Goldman Sachs

Polymarket

Kalshi

Mercury

PhonePe

Razorpay

Paytm

CRED

Groww

Zerodha

Wealthsimple

RBC

Starling Bank

Commonwealth Bank

Airwallex

N26

Trade Republic

Developer Tools and Enterprise Software

GitHub

Atlassian

ServiceNow

Salesforce

Snowflake

Cloudflare

Figma

Notion

Canva

Vercel

Wiz

Workday

Rippling

MongoDB

Redis

GitLab

Confluent

HashiCorp

Docker

Elastic

Grafana Labs

Temporal

Supabase

Linear

Airtable

Miro

Slack

Twilio

Okta

Zoom

Dropbox

Zscaler

Palo Alto Networks

SentinelOne

Snyk

Deel

Gusto

Samsara

Factory AI

Replit

Modal

LangChain

Pinecone

Zoho

Freshworks

Postman

BrowserStack

HighRadius

Sprinklr

Defense and Frontier Tech

Anduril

Palantir

SpaceX

Waymo

Zoox

Neuralink

Rivian

Boston Dynamics

Figure AI

Applied Intuition

IT Services and Global Delivery

TCS

Infosys

Cognizant

Wipro

Accenture

Capgemini

HCLTech

Tech Mahindra

LTIMindtree

What These Loops Have in Common (and Where They Diverge)

FAQ

Full Interview Guides

Most candidates prepare for "the tech interview" as if every company runs the same one. They do not. At Airbnb, a values interviewer from outside your team can veto an offer, even after strong technical rounds. At Cursor, the deciding round is a paid project of about eight hours in the company's real codebase, with AI tools encouraged. At Shopify, the signature interview is a chronological walk through your whole life. At Databricks, the round that removes prepared candidates is live multi-threaded programming. Jane Street will tell you not to use OCaml. Anthropic will tell you exactly when you may and may not use Claude. Ramp puts a small puzzle inside the job application itself.

Interviews differ more by company than by role. After the fundamentals, the most useful preparation is studying the specific company you face. This guide collects our research-backed interview guides for 198 top technology companies, grouped by sector. Each entry explains what makes that company's loop (its full sequence of interview rounds) distinctive. Each entry also links to the full round-by-round breakdowns.

How These Guides Are Organized

For each company, we cover the parts of its interview that matter most. Not every company has all of them:

  • The interview process, round by round: every stage from recruiter screen to offer. It lists formats, timelines, and the rounds unique to that company.
  • Behavioral interview questions: what the company screens for culturally, the questions candidates report, and worked sample answers in that company's style.
  • The system design interview: the reported questions, what interviewers probe, and a walkthrough of one signature design problem.
  • How to answer "Why do you want to work here?": what interviewers listen for in the motivation question, with a full sample answer and the common mistakes.
  • How long it takes to hear back: the reported wait after each stage, whether the company sends rejection emails, how to follow up, when you can reapply, and what to wear.
  • The entrance test: for the IT services companies that hire through one, the sections it contains, the time each takes, and the eligibility rules the company publishes.

Use the guides together. Read the process guide first to map your loop. Then prepare each round with its dedicated guide.

AI Labs and AI Infrastructure

The frontier AI companies run the most distinctive interviews in tech, from mission screening to work-sample projects. Their rules on using AI during interviews also differ widely. Learn your company's rules before the interview.

Anthropic

Anthropic pairs practical, implementation-heavy coding with an explicit values interview. That values interview rejects more strong engineers than any technical round. Its official AI policy is widely misreported: you may refine your application with Claude, but live interviews and most take-homes are AI-free.

OpenAI

OpenAI publishes its own grading standard: well-designed solutions, high-quality code, performance, and test coverage. It may run system design twice in one loop. Product-flavored design questions expect full-stack answers: wireframes, API contracts, and schemas, not only a backend diagram.

xAI

xAI moves from first call to offer in two to three weeks. It requires a "Statement of Exceptional Work" with the application. Many loops end with a presentation of a project you owned. There is no dedicated behavioral round; interviewers probe ownership and autonomy inside the technical conversations.

Google DeepMind

DeepMind really runs three different loops. Software engineers get Google-style rounds. Research engineers get ML-depth rounds with paper presentations. Scientists get research discussions. Interviews are strictly AI-tool-free, and the hiring committee alone can take three to four weeks.

Perplexity

Perplexity averages about 23 days from application to offer and ends with a founder interview. Every system design question relates to AI search: RAG (retrieval-augmented generation), retrieval, crawling freshness, and the tradeoff between cost, latency, and quality.

Scale AI

Scale's loop includes a signature debugging round: you fix problems in an unfamiliar multi-file codebase under a time limit. Its recruiters openly screen for comfort with a high-intensity culture. After the Meta deal, the "why Scale, why now" question is a genuine filter.

Cursor (Anysphere)

Cursor's decision round is unlike any other in tech. It is a paid project of about eight hours inside Cursor's actual codebase, with AI tools explicitly encouraged. A review follows, and you defend every line there. Candidates report that using AI badly is the fastest way to fail.

Databricks

Databricks runs one of the hardest engineering loops in the industry. The most feared stage is the concurrency round (live multi-threaded programming). That round is known for removing candidates who prepared only for FAANG-style interviews. Its behavioral round maps one to one onto six published values.

Mistral AI

Mistral, Europe's frontier lab, runs one of AI's fastest loops (about two weeks). It has two unusual rounds. One is a structured LLM quiz with expected answers on transformer internals and KV caching. The other is a review round where you correct a deliberately messy pull request. Some coding rounds ask you to implement multi-headed attention from scratch.

Cohere

Cohere, the enterprise-first lab, tests production ML code. You write tests and run your solutions, and recited LeetCode answers get flagged. Unusually among AI labs, it runs a genuine dedicated behavioral round. System design centers on multi-tenant model serving: cost per query, GPU scheduling, and tenant isolation.

Hugging Face

Hugging Face, the open-source ML company, hires like an open-source project. There is no LeetCode. Expect two to three conversations plus a take-home built on real problems the company is working on. You present and defend the take-home afterward. Your public GitHub and Hub activity work as a standing portfolio, and the cover letter genuinely matters.

ElevenLabs

ElevenLabs, the AI-audio company, wants "founders who happen to be looking for a job." Its behavioral round is a detailed review of projects you led or created. Its signature product decomposition round asks you to design the user experience and the system together for a voice-product use case.

Groq

Groq, the inference-chip company, runs a holistic loop. It includes an hour-long personality interview, sometimes with a VP. The company officially advises candidates to skip heavy LeetCode practice and show their GitHub and real work instead. Design conversations focus on serving open models fast on deterministic, compiler-scheduled chips.

Runway

Candidates report a fast loop of five to six conversations, about three weeks total. The onsite mixes coding, system design, a deep dive on past work, and a behavioral round.

Together AI

The loop usually finishes in two to four weeks. It pairs fast coding rounds with an applied machine learning systems interview and team conversations.

Cerebras

Cerebras runs coding rounds on HackerRank, a shared online editor, in 45 minute sessions. The full process takes three to six weeks, and loop size varies widely by team.

Glean

Candidates describe the difficulty as higher than most startups of similar size. The onsite adds a practical build exercise, and some candidates report a round on using AI tools.

Sierra

Sierra's loop includes a project where you build an AI agent. The company has also described an AI native format: you plan a project, then build it in about two hours with AI tools.

Harvey

Harvey runs a coding phone screen plus four onsite rounds, including a project deep dive. Candidates report practical interviews with freedom to use familiar tools.

Thinking Machines Lab

Thinking Machines Lab does not publish an interview process, and public reports are few. Expect the typical frontier lab loop: a recruiter call, a technical screen, and three to five final interviews.

Safe Superintelligence (SSI)

SSI hires quietly, often through direct outreach or a referral. The company says it spends hours judging a candidate's character before it weighs publication counts.

Mercor

Mercor's loop includes a short AI led interview and a five hour final round. Some candidates finish the whole process in about two weeks.

Cognition

Public reports describe a first call, a coding screen, and a final round of three to five sessions. Some roles add a take home exercise inside Devin, the company's AI software engineer.

Decagon

Candidates report five to six steps over three to four weeks. The loop includes 60 minute pair coding and a system design round about AI agent style systems.

Abridge

Candidates report four main steps over about a month. The hiring manager round includes a short design discussion, and the behavioral round sometimes includes an engineering executive.

Physical Intelligence

Physical Intelligence does not publish its loop, and candidate reports are rare. The company hires in San Francisco, and its own job listings are the best public signal of what interviews test.

Lovable

Lovable's signature stage is paid trial work, about two days with the team in Stockholm. No public account of the loop includes an algorithm puzzle round.

Baseten

Baseten's coding screen is a 60 minute practical session in CoderPad, with reported tasks such as downloading a file in parallel chunks. The loop ends with a goals conversation that often includes a founder. Candidates report that Baseten interviews many people for each role, so a slow reply is normal.

Fireworks AI

Fireworks AI runs an onsite of four to seven interviews. One candidate reports seven rounds, four of them cross-team conversations. Some roles add a take-home chat app built on the Fireworks API, reviewed in detail in a later round.

Higgsfield

Higgsfield states that its whole hiring process takes one to two weeks, from first conversation to offer. Its careers page says an AI recruiter named Emma supports candidates through it. Round names are not published, and the company says about 40 percent of the team are filmmakers and creatives.

CoreWeave

CoreWeave's coding screen is practical and often in Go, with one report of a round focused on concurrency. The behavioral round includes many conflict questions, such as disagreement with a manager. Glassdoor lists about 32 days to a decision, and the common complaint is silence after the final round.

Crusoe

Crusoe's final loop runs three to five interviews, including a project deep dive sometimes presented with slides. Interviewers keep asking about that project until they find where your real involvement ended. One candidate reports a verbal offer whose level was lowered five days later.

Gimlet Labs

Gimlet Labs does not publish its rounds, but its application form asks one written technical question. The distributed systems role asks about a production issue you diagnosed, and the inference roles ask about a kernel you optimized. Engineering works in the San Francisco office five days per week.

Nebius

Nebius publishes its own interview guide, promising a resume reply within three business days and feedback within one week of each interview. Candidates report mixed results against those promises. The guide also names a list of common latency numbers to review before the preliminary coding interview.

Synthesia

Synthesia publishes its five stages in its job postings. The take-home has no deadline and no set language, while tech lead roles get a 90 minute live coding session instead. Synthesia says the process can be done in seven working days, though candidates report about three weeks.

AI sector at a glance:

CompanyTypical timelineSignature roundScreens hardest for
Anthropic3-8 weeksValues/culture interviewMission alignment, honesty
OpenAI4-8 weeksDouble system designPractical code quality
xAI2-3 weeksExceptional-work presentationOwnership, autonomy
Google DeepMind6-10 weeksPaper presentation (research)Unaided depth, rigor
Perplexity~23 daysFounder interviewCuriosity, speed
Scale AI~3 weeksUnfamiliar-codebase debuggingIntensity, urgency
CursorFastPaid 8-hour codebase projectAI-assisted judgment
Databricks4-7 weeksConcurrency roundRaw technical bar
Mistral AI~2 weeksLLM quiz with expected answersAutonomy, precision
Cohere4-6 weeksDedicated behavioral roundProduction ML, collaboration
Hugging Face2-4 weeksReal-problem take-homeOpen-source citizenship
ElevenLabs3-5 weeksProduct decomposition roundFounder instincts
GroqA few weeksPersonality interviewBuilder evidence, curiosity

Big Tech

The established giants run the most structured loops. Each grades culture against a named rubric (a written scoring guide). Microsoft scores growth mindset. Netflix applies the keeper test. Nvidia screens for calm responses to blunt criticism.

Apple

Apple's process is decentralized: each team designs its own loop. Behavioral evaluation happens in every round instead of one dedicated round. The consistent standard: craft, low ego, comfort with secrecy, and a real opinion about an Apple product.

Microsoft

Microsoft interviewers are trained to score behavioral answers against growth mindset and named competencies. Inclusion is an explicit scoring dimension. Use STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result), then add what you learned: the rubric rewards the learning step specifically.

Netflix

Netflix is the one company where the culture interview can override strong technical performance. Roughly half the evaluation is alignment with the published Culture Memo. The keeper test (managers ask whether they would work hard to keep each person) shapes every round. Study the memo like a syllabus, because it works like one.

Nvidia

Nvidia hires by team, and interviews come almost entirely from that team's actual work. Candidates commonly report waits of five weeks or more after the onsite. The behavioral screen reflects a famously blunt culture. The central probe is how you receive hard, public criticism.

Tesla

Tesla schedules the hiring manager conversation before any technical screen. Interviewers test fundamentals from first principles. Finalists are increasingly asked for an "Evidence of Excellence" write-up of their best work. Expect a standard comparable to Google at a much faster pace.

Adobe

Adobe's assessment mixes coding with multiple-choice questions on CS fundamentals, where unprepared candidates lose many points. Its design rounds cover three levels: product architecture, object-oriented design, and database judgment. Behavioral evaluation uses two themes: own the outcome, and create the future.

LinkedIn

LinkedIn grades communication and tradeoff explanation as explicitly as code. Its design questions are product-centric graph problems: feed, notifications, and People You May Know. The members-first value produces its most distinctive behavioral probe: user trust versus growth metrics.

Oracle

Oracle is several companies in one (OCI, database, applications), and loops differ across them. Timelines run four to eight weeks. The distinctive Bartender round brings in an interviewer from outside the team to check the hiring standard, like Amazon's Bar Raiser.

IBM

IBM includes a system design round in most mid-level and senior loops. The round lasts 45 to 60 minutes and grades scalability, reliability, and maintainability.

Intel

Each Intel business group hires separately, so the four to six stages vary. Embedded and platform teams ask lower level design questions than cloud teams do.

Cisco

Candidates report that behavioral evaluation takes about half of Cisco's interview time. The design round rewards candidates who understand protocols, packets, and hardware limits.

Qualcomm

Qualcomm asks behavioral questions inside technical rounds, with no separate values interview. The design round is usually low-level design: schedulers, memory allocators, and drivers, not web-scale systems.

AMD

The AMD onsite loop includes a debugging session and a computer architecture round. Design interviews happen at the hardware-software boundary and expect real C or C++.

SAP

SAP's technical rounds are often elimination rounds, so one weak round ends the process. A dedicated managerial round tests the "How We Run" culture framework.

Big tech at a glance:

CompanyTypical timelineSignature elementScreens hardest for
AppleVaries by teamBehavioral woven through all roundsCraft, low ego
Microsoft3-6 weeksGrowth-mindset scoringLearning from failure
Netflix3-5 weeksCulture deep-dive (can veto)Candor, judgment
Nvidia4-8 weeks + slow tailTeam-specific domain deep-diveCriticism resilience
Tesla~1 monthEvidence of Excellence write-upFirst-principles thinking
Adobe3-6 weeksFundamentals MCQs + 3-altitude designOwnership with numbers
LinkedIn~3-4 weeksCommunication-graded roundsMembers-first judgment
Oracle4-8 weeksBartender calibration roundDependability

Consumer, Marketplace, and Commerce

Consumer companies interview through their product realities: marketplace tradeoffs at Uber and DoorDash, values interviews with veto power at Airbnb, and a biography instead of a behavioral round at Shopify.

Uber

Uber runs a dedicated bar-raiser-style behavioral round scored against its published values. Its most distinctive question shape is the marketplace tradeoff: two groups with opposite interests, and your reasoning between them.

Airbnb

Airbnb's core values interviews are run by trained interviewers from outside your team. They can decide the outcome regardless of technical performance. Personal-life examples are explicitly welcome. Prepare these interviews as seriously as any coding round.

DoorDash

DoorDash's loop features the practical CodeCraft round: build a working piece of logistics software, like a Dasher-pay calculator. Its culture makes the operator mindset a formal practice: every employee, engineers included, does deliveries a few times a year.

Spotify

Spotify runs a case-study round most candidates never practice: handle a realistic production incident live, from metrics to stakeholder communication. Its values interview kept real decision weight through the company's restructuring years.

Shopify

Shopify's signature is the Life Story interview: a 60-minute chronological walk through your life. It is designed to defeat rehearsed answers and to measure how fast you grow. Pair programming often welcomes your own IDE and AI tools, if you can defend every line.

TikTok and ByteDance

ByteDance's loops are algorithm-heavy. Its behavioral rounds are scored against the six ByteStyle values, and stories about failing while moving fast are the natural material. For TikTok specifically, the motivation question rewards real engagement with the recommendation engine. It also rewards an honest view of the work pace, plus one calm sentence about the geopolitics.

Reddit

Reddit's motivation question has a built-in authenticity check: "which communities are you active in?" Candidates with a genuine history on the platform have an advantage nothing else replaces. Moderators have the strongest advantage.

Duolingo

Duolingo puts two engineers in every technical round: one interviews, one shadows. It values real engineering sense and product thinking over hard LeetCode. The onsite includes pair programming, code review, and a coffee chat that is also evaluated. Python is the standard house language. Genuine product usage (a real streak) helps in every round.

Roblox

Roblox's online assessment is the most unusual in big tech. It runs about two hours and combines coding, proprietary game-based challenges, and a built-in 25-minute behavioral section. A Bar Raiser round is the final step. Everything is scored against a precisely stated value order: community before company, company before team, team before individual.

Discord

Discord's signature round asks you to build a working service from scratch. The most-reported question is concrete: a telnet-compatible TCP chat server that handles concurrent clients. The full-day panel includes named Values and Attitude sessions. Product sense for gamers and communities is explicitly noticed.

Walmart Global Tech

Walmart, the world's largest company, runs a structured loop. It starts with a HackerRank assessment mixing Python and SQL. Technical rounds split between low-level and high-level design. A conversational hiring-manager round ends the process, and STAR-format answers are expected there. Design rounds use retail's signature problems: one accurate view of omnichannel inventory, and Black Friday traffic spikes.

Pinterest

Pinterest runs three stages that end in four to six onsite interviews. Its behavioral questions center on the value put Pinners first.

Snap

Snap's system design round is shaped by disappearing messages. Its behavioral questions follow the values kind, smart, and creative.

Instacart

Instacart asks narrow, product-shaped design questions about inventory, dispatch, and fulfillment. Its behavioral round follows its five published values.

Lyft

Lyft's onsite adds a laptop programming exercise to the usual rounds. Its design questions map to the rideshare product.

Booking.com

Booking.com starts with an unusual assessment: build a small working feature, not a puzzle. Mid-level and senior candidates also get a system design round.

Expedia

Expedia adds a strengths assessment, an automated test of behavior and judgment. The test is unusual among tech companies, so prepare for it.

eBay

Candidates report that coding matters most in the eBay loop. The design round includes a walkthrough of an auction system.

Twitch

Amazon owns Twitch, and its hiring follows Amazon's framework closely. Leadership Principle questions appear in every round, not just one.

Epic Games

Many Epic Games roles include a take-home coding task. Interviewers also test how much you care about games.

Unity

Unity runs three to five rounds, and all happen over video. Questions stay close to real engine and tooling work.

Flipkart

Flipkart's loop is defined by a machine coding round of 90 to 120 minutes, often on your own laptop. Reported problems include a multi-level cache, an expense splitting application, and a library system with fine rules. Flipkart states a cooling period of six months after an unsuccessful interview.

Swiggy

Swiggy's machine coding round runs about 120 minutes, with no internet access and no outside code allowed. Reported problems include a Snake and Ladder game, a parking lot ticketing system, and CRUD APIs. Several candidates report a rejection at the later design round after clearing the coding rounds.

Zomato

Zomato hires largely through referrals, and applicants without one report long silences. Design work appears inside a technical interview rather than in a separate machine coding round. Zomato belongs to Eternal, alongside Blinkit, District, and Hyperpure, so the panel may work on another brand.

Meesho

Meesho's machine coding round runs about 60 to 120 minutes, and reported problems include a car pooling system and a parking lot system. Reports name HackerEarth and HackerRank as the platforms. Because Meesho charges sellers no commission, the design round rewards candidates who state the money cost of each choice.

Zepto

Zepto runs its technical rounds through BarRaiser, an outside service that supplies trained interviewers. One report describes about 25 minutes per problem in the coding round, so speed is part of the grade. Frontend candidates report a separate loop of three rounds, including machine coding in React.

Myntra

Myntra's technology leadership has described scoring each round from one to five, with three and above advancing. That same account says junior candidates are judged on code design, modularity, naming, and documentation. Senior candidates report a machine coding round, such as building an e-commerce back end entirely in memory.

Dream11

Three of Dream11's five rounds are held at the Mumbai office, and candidates report that travel is arranged for them. Candidates describe every round as an elimination round. The design round uses the company's own problems, such as notifying users of match lineups about thirty minutes before the start.

Ola

Ola hires across several businesses, including ride hailing, Ola Maps, Krutrim and Ola Electric, so rounds differ by team. Experienced candidates report a machine coding round, with tasks such as a publish and subscribe system. One report describes a design round longer than 90 minutes.

Udaan

Candidates report no separate algorithm round at Udaan for experienced hires. The machine coding round decides most outcomes, with about 90 minutes to build a small program and about 30 minutes to explain it. Candidates report submitting the code and a README file as a zip archive.

Deliveroo

Deliveroo publishes its own engineering interview guide and names five stages: the prescreen, the technical screen, the full loop, the hiring committee, and allocation. It calls the design round the architecture interview and gives the timings, about five minutes of introduction, about 45 minutes of design, then time for your questions.

Ocado Technology

Ocado Technology is the engineering arm of Ocado Group, with major hubs in the United Kingdom and in Krakow, Poland. It builds the Ocado Smart Platform that other grocers license, so the engineering is warehouse robotics, routing, and large scale fulfilment. Candidates report four to five steps and roughly six hours of interview time, including a pair programming session.

Zalando

Zalando publishes its own engineering interview process and lists five stages: a call with a Talent Acquisition Partner, an interview with the hiring manager, a coding interview, a system design and architecture interview, and a general tech interview. It also names the six areas it grades in the design round, which include architecture, scalability, and technology choice.

Allegro

Allegro is the largest e-commerce marketplace in Poland. It publishes its own hiring process as three stages: a Devskiller test of 90 minutes, a block of technical talks split into two parts, and a meeting of about one hour with a team leader and someone from HR. Its careers page describes the design conversation as designing a distributed system for a business requirement, then discussing the choices you made.

CD Projekt Red

CD Projekt Red is a game studio in Warsaw, Poland, and it publishes its hiring as four steps named "Let's see!", "Let's talk!", "Let's check!", and "Let's go!". Public sources do not show a system design round in the form large technology companies run it. The technical screening happens instead in a test assignment and an interview with senior developers.

Mercado Libre

Mercado Libre is the Latin American e-commerce and fintech company, written as Mercado Livre in Brazil and Mercado Libre in Spanish speaking markets. Candidates report four to six steps over three to six weeks. The design question arrives inside the live technical interview rather than as a separate round.

iFood

iFood is the largest food delivery company in Latin America, based in Brazil, and candidates report that the process runs in Portuguese. The reported shape is four to six steps, starting with a recruiter call and a timed coding exercise. The design round gives you a scenario, keeps the discussion at a high level, and then raises problems against your answer.

Grab

Grab is the Southeast Asian superapp company headquartered in Singapore, covering ride hailing, delivery, and financial services. Its careers site names four hiring stages and says the functional interviews run up to four rounds, and engineering candidates report about five steps inside them. One of those rounds is a design question of about 45 to 60 minutes built on Grab's own product problems.

Shopee

Shopee is the e-commerce arm of Sea Group, headquartered in Singapore with engineering across Southeast Asia. Candidates report four or five steps over about two to four weeks, and the shape changes by office and by role. Design questions usually arrive inside the technical rounds rather than in a round of their own, sometimes mixed with fundamentals and a coding problem in the same session.

Consumer and marketplace at a glance:

CompanySignature elementScreens hardest for
UberBar-raiser behavioral roundMarketplace tradeoff reasoning
AirbnbCore values interview (can veto)Mission and hosting behavior
DoorDashCodeCraft round, WeDash cultureOwnership, operator mindset
SpotifyProduction-incident case studyAutonomy with alignment
ShopifyLife Story interviewAgency, trajectory slope
TikTok/ByteDanceByteStyle-scored behavioralPace, candor
RedditCommunity authenticity checkGenuine product connection
DuolingoTwo engineers in every roundLearners-first product sense
RobloxGame-based OA + Bar RaiserCommunity-first values
DiscordBuild-a-service round (TCP chat server)Ownership, product sense
Walmart Global TechSplit LLD/HLD + STAR disciplineScale delivery, customer service

Fintech and Quantitative Finance

Interviews at financial companies have extra requirements. Idempotency (an operation that is safe to repeat), reconciliation, and incident ownership are assumed vocabulary. The elite quant firms also differ sharply from one another.

Stripe

Stripe's loop simulates real work. It includes an integration round with a real repo, API docs, and full internet access. It also has a debugging round in unfamiliar code and a rare dedicated API design round. Behavioral interviewers are trained to filter out polished but vague answers fast.

PayPal

PayPal's assessment includes Java and OOP fundamentals that algorithms-only candidates miss. Its loop values communication and reasoning over LeetCode difficulty. Fintech-grade correctness themes appear throughout.

Robinhood

Robinhood runs a proctored assessment and finance-flavored coding (order books, ledgers). Its design rounds apply a Safety First standard, which reflects a company rebuilt around reliability. Its favorite behavioral question: describe a time you disagreed with leadership, professionally.

Ramp

Ramp hides a small CTF (capture-the-flag) puzzle in the job application. It runs a four-level progressive coding assessment, and your early architecture decides whether the later levels are possible. The average time to offer is eleven days. It hires "tiny CEOs" and asks for your controversial opinions, plural.

Citadel

Citadel's HackerRank assessment uses hidden tests that fail solutions that are correct but not optimal. Its onsite pushes from correct to optimal to the constant factors. Its design rounds work in microsecond budgets: order books, feed handlers, and code written with hardware behavior in mind.

Jane Street

Jane Street's onsite is three to four paired rounds of 70 minutes, and they extend one evolving problem. Two common beliefs about the firm are wrong: SWE candidates need neither OCaml nor probability drills. Honesty is built into the process: they ask you to disclose if you have seen a problem before.

Two Sigma

Two Sigma, the scientist's quant fund, runs a hard assessment where all hidden tests must pass. Phone screens include rapid-fire CS fundamentals. Its signature round combines design and implementation: you architect a small system, then build it as working code within the session. Precise, calibrated communication is graded throughout.

Bloomberg

Bloomberg's loop is famous for two things. First, its tagged practice-question pool genuinely reflects its interviews. Second, candidates who solve everything perfectly still get rejected on weak "why Bloomberg" answers: genuine interest decides offers. The system design round (real-time market data, conflation, entitlements) is consistently reported as the hardest.

Capital One

Capital One's Power Day includes a round no other major tech employer gives software engineers: a case interview. You reason aloud through a business scenario, like a credit card's breakeven math, and end with a recommendation. Behavioral answers use STAR format against defined competencies, ideally with results converted into business units.

Intuit

Intuit's loop is anchored by the Craft Demonstration. You receive a GitHub repository 24 to 48 hours in advance, then implement user stories live before a panel. Clean code and unit testing are explicitly graded. Interviews now also probe how you use AI responsibly when models handle customers' money.

Block (Square)

Block runs a practical loop: pair programming and realistic problems, not puzzles. Design questions come from Square, Cash App, and Afterpay products.

Chime

Chime runs four stages, ending in a virtual onsite of four to five hours. Reliability themes appear even in the coding rounds.

Plaid

Plaid often finishes in about three weeks, faster than most companies its size. Interviewers add requirements as you work, and design questions probe failure handling.

Brex

Brex interviews in four to five rounds over about three weeks. The values interview counts as much as the technical rounds.

Affirm

Affirm favors practical tasks over puzzle style algorithm questions. For senior roles, candidates report the design round matters most in the loop.

Klarna

Klarna runs five to seven rounds, including a craft deep dive and a leadership principles interview. Some candidates also report a logic test and questions about AI tools.

Revolut

Revolut adds a take-home project of about four to eight hours. Most candidates then present it in an architecture review.

Nubank

Nubank rewards a functional programming mindset across five to six stages, including pair programming. Design rounds assume event-driven systems, often with Kafka.

Wise

Wise closes its loop with a values conversation. Its design interviews use business cases, mostly for senior roles, and value correctness above raw scale.

Toast

Toast asks restaurant questions: offline point of sale systems and payments on bad networks. A reported follow up asks what happens when two terminals edit the same check.

Hudson River Trading

Hudson River Trading runs five stages over one to two months. Its design questions are low level: operating systems, networking, lock-free structures, and latency.

Jump Trading

Jump Trading spreads systems questions across the loop instead of one classic design round. Candidates compare the coding difficulty to the hardest big tech rounds.

D. E. Shaw

D. E. Shaw tests careful reasoning as much as raw coding speed. Design interviewers want stated assumptions, real numbers, and honest tradeoffs.

JPMorgan Chase

JPMorgan Chase ends with a superday, a single day of three to four interviews. Coding difficulty is moderate, with more attention on fundamentals and behavior.

Goldman Sachs

Goldman Sachs runs four main stages ending in a Superday of three to five interviews. A strong design round often sets the level of the offer.

Polymarket

Polymarket does not publish an interview guide, and public candidate reports are scarce. One third-party guide infers three rounds from job postings, rather than from candidate reports. Design questions most likely follow the product, since Polymarket matches orders off-chain and settles trades on the Polygon blockchain.

Kalshi

Kalshi asks why you want to work there in writing, on the application form itself. One reported coding round asked the candidate to implement a class and compare the possible solutions. Reports note that the small team hires for a specific need, so strong candidates are sometimes declined.

Mercury

Mercury's backend technical screen is a review of a SQL pull request, not a coding puzzle. One candidate reports a later three hour session: a briefing, solo coding, then a shared code review. Mercury's backend is written in Haskell, but guides say any mainstream language is accepted.

PhonePe

PhonePe's machine coding round is about 90 minutes, followed by a 15 to 30 minute review of your code. Reported problems include a multilevel cache with least frequently used eviction and a product search backend with sponsored results. Reports say readable classes count for more than clever algorithms.

Razorpay

Razorpay's machine coding round runs roughly one to two hours, and the most reported problem is an in-memory relational database with indexes and constraints. Interviewers commonly add a new requirement partway through the session. One candidate reports a rejection despite a correct solution, because the code was judged insufficiently modular.

Paytm

Paytm candidates for backend roles do not report a separate machine coding round. Design is discussed inside another round, and the most reported question is a system with several wallet types and a linked bank account. Interviewers ask detailed questions about idempotency, locking, and transaction isolation.

CRED

CRED's project or machine coding round is reported at about 150 minutes on HackerRank. Reported problems include a file manager, a payment processor, a cache, and a search box with suggestions. The coding test before it covers greedy logic, bitmask dynamic programming, and combinatorics.

Groww

Groww adds a machine coding round of 90 minutes to two hours, where you build a small working program. Reported tasks include an expense sharing application and a stock exchange that matches buy and sell bids. Freshers report neither that round nor the system design round.

Zerodha

Zerodha replaces algorithm puzzles with a small practical take-home task. One published example is fetching a zip file over HTTP and processing the CSV inside it. The grading covers how the code is organized and what the README explains.

Wealthsimple

Wealthsimple is a Canadian financial technology company in Toronto, and candidates report four to six steps over about three to four weeks. Its design round is unusual: candidates report a session named Bring Your Own System, where you present a system you built yourself instead of solving a question the interviewer sets.

RBC

RBC is Royal Bank of Canada, and it calls its technology organization Tech@RBC. Candidates report four to six steps over about two to eight weeks, including a recorded video interview and, for some roles, a Superday of three to five short sessions. Design questions come from the bank's own work: payments, transaction throughput, client data, and migrations without downtime.

Starling Bank

Starling Bank lists four stages in its own engineering job postings: an interview with an engineer, a take-home technical test it describes as about three hours, a technical interview, and a final interview. There is no separate design round, so the design discussion and the review of your take-home code happen in the same session.

Commonwealth Bank

Commonwealth Bank, which uses the name CommBank in public, runs two different hiring paths. Experienced technology candidates report four to five steps, while the graduate program runs its own sequence. The bank states one timeline itself: its Talent Acquisition team contacts applicants within three weeks of the role closing.

Airwallex

Airwallex is an Australian founded payments company with engineering across Melbourne, Singapore, and other hubs. Candidates report four to five steps with two or three technical rounds of about 45 to 60 minutes each. The design questions come from its own problems: multi-currency wallets, double entry ledgers, idempotent transaction engines, and end of day reconciliation.

N26

N26 is a mobile bank in Berlin that holds a full German banking license. Candidates report four to six steps for engineering roles, starting with a recruiter screen and a take-home coding test on Codility. The design round runs about one hour and uses banking problems rather than generic social network questions.

Trade Republic

Trade Republic is a European neobroker based in Berlin. Candidates report four to six stages, beginning with a short intro call and a take-home project, then a technical interview about the code you submitted. The design round is run by two senior engineers and uses the company's own problems, such as the infrastructure that executes savings plans on a schedule.

Fintech and quant at a glance:

CompanyTypical timelineSignature roundScreens hardest for
Stripe4-8 weeksIntegration round (real repo + docs)Evidence-dense honesty
PayPalA few weeksPair programming + project deep diveAccountability
Robinhood4-6 weeksDomain LLD (order book, ledger)Safety-first judgment
Ramp~11 days4-level progressive assessmentUnprompted ownership
Citadel4-8 weeksOptimal-or-fail assessmentAlgorithmic ceiling
Jane StreetA few weeks70-minute paired evolving problemCollaboration, honesty
Two Sigma4-6 weeksDesign-and-implementation roundRigor, precise communication
Bloomberg3-7 weeksReal-time financial system designGenuine interest (offer-deciding)
Capital OneA few weeksCase interview on Power DayBusiness-fluent engineering
Intuit4-6 weeksCraft DemonstrationCustomer obsession, craft

Developer Tools and Enterprise Software

The companies that build for developers and enterprises rely on work samples more than whiteboards. Expect take-homes, pairing, code review, and multi-day craft challenges.

GitHub

GitHub's loop is built from realistic work. It includes a take-home graded on tests, docs, and commit hygiene, plus a pairing exercise and a code review round. Recruiters read your public GitHub profile before you say a word.

Atlassian

Atlassian publishes official guides for every craft round. It also runs one of tech's most decisive values interviews, mapped to five named values. Candidates regularly pass every technical round and still fail there.

ServiceNow

ServiceNow's assessment mixes coding with multiple-choice questions on CS fundamentals. Its design round tests topics almost nobody practices: multi-tenant enterprise platforms, workflow engines, and upgrade safety.

Salesforce

Salesforce spreads behavioral evaluation across every final-round interview instead of one culture round. Answers are scored against its values, with Trust explicitly first. Prepare a set of stories, not a single performance.

Snowflake

Snowflake's coding problems hide data-systems twists: inputs that exceed memory, and streams with duplicates. Its behavioral questions turn technical in the middle of your answer. Every ownership story needs its central tradeoff prepared at whiteboard depth.

Cloudflare

Cloudflare's culture round has a name (the Orange Cloud round) and a strict 30 minutes. Its values include "No Bullshit". Interviewers explicitly flag rehearsed answers, so short, honest, specific answers win.

Figma

Figma expects real product usage, and thin usage hurts across the loop. It runs a project deep dive where numbers are expected. System design focuses on real-time multiplayer infrastructure: WebSockets, presence, and state recovery.

Notion

Notion's coding rounds feature live debugging and optimization that you explain aloud. Its design rounds genuinely cover CRDTs (conflict-free replicated data types) and flexible data models. The loop ends with a leadership conversation on values and long-term vision.

Canva

Canva's centerpiece is the Craft Challenge: a multi-day take-home project with a defense review, treated as the main evaluation. Its values round scores against five named values. Make Complex Things Simple is the most probed.

Vercel

Vercel designs its interviews to feel like real work: shared editors instead of whiteboards, with Google explicitly encouraged. There is a proctored 90-minute assessment. Rounds come from a practical menu that includes app building, code review, and architecture review. A strong public GitHub can get the async assessment waived entirely.

Wiz

Wiz is now part of Google Cloud after the largest cybersecurity acquisition ever. It keeps its startup pace: a loop that follows a set playbook, with an intense final panel. Hiring managers actively coach candidates between rounds; take that coaching literally. Design rounds cover its distinctive domain: agentless cloud scanning and the Security Graph.

Workday

Workday's interviewers score behavioral answers against six published values on literal scorecards, with Employees first in stated order. Candidates who treat the "Fun" value as unimportant reportedly fail regardless of technical performance. The loop adds a dedicated VIBE inclusion interview, an emphasis on object-oriented design, and a final executive conversation.

Rippling

Rippling's signature is a 90-minute round in two parts: build something, then critique what you built. Honest self-assessment is graded as a real skill. Its AI policy is the industry's most unusual: tools are optional and open, but the grading rubric changes with your choice. The culture is openly intense, and recruiters confirm from the first call that you accept that.

MongoDB

The loop runs from recruiter screen to a multi-round onsite across three to five weeks. Behavioral questions map to MongoDB's six core values.

Redis

Most candidates already use the Redis database, so interviewers expect a specific personal story. Design questions connect directly to the Redis product line.

GitLab

GitLab builds its technical interview around a merge request. Behavioral rounds test the CREDIT values, and the full process commonly takes about a month.

Confluent

Confluent sees itself as the home of Kafka, and its loop includes an engineering values round. Expect distributed systems questions such as design a message queue.

HashiCorp

The HashiCorp loop adds a PR review round to practical coding, system design, and behavioral interviews. Interviewers also test fit with its remote culture.

Docker

Docker interviewers expect you to speak as a user of the product. The loop ends with a culture interview, and design questions connect to Docker Hub.

Elastic

Elastic runs a dedicated values round based on its Source Code. Design questions connect to its search and observability products.

Grafana Labs

Grafana Labs runs practical coding and a concrete system design round. Its design questions are observability flavored and use real numbers.

Temporal

Temporal builds a platform for durable execution, and its design questions match that: schedulers, task queues, and state that survives crashes.

Supabase

Supabase hires for low ego and intrinsic motivation, and its loop includes a practical take home. Design questions build on Postgres: multi tenancy, realtime updates, and pooling.

Linear

Linear ends its process with a paid work trial. Its architecture round favors real-time sync and offline-first clients.

Airtable

Airtable runs an onsite of four to six interviews. Design rounds favor collaborative editing and large table performance.

Miro

Miro runs its system design round on a Miro board. A dedicated Behaviors round tests teamwork, empathy, impact, and growth.

Slack

Slack pairs its technical loop with a values interview built on six company values. The final loop runs four to five interviews over three to five weeks.

Twilio

Twilio starts with an online coding test and ends with a loop of four to six interviews. Behavioral questions follow its Twilio Magic values.

Okta

Okta sells identity and access management software, so its technical rounds include security questions. The process usually takes three to six weeks.

Zoom

Zoom's stated core value is care, so interviewers listen for customer focus and humility. The design round uses both high-level and low-level formats.

Dropbox

Dropbox screens with a CodeSignal assessment before its live rounds. Behavioral questions map to its four published values, and design questions center on file sync.

Zscaler

Most of the Zscaler behavioral evaluation happens in the hiring manager round. Interviewers there expect numbers in your answers, not general claims.

Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks runs a values interview alongside its technical rounds, over about five to six weeks. Design questions favor security data pipelines and log alerting.

SentinelOne

SentinelOne screens for trust, accountability, and ingenuity across its rounds. Design questions map to its endpoint security products.

Snyk

The Snyk loop includes a take-home review and a pair programming round. Behavioral questions are organized by its four company values.

Deel

Deel is fully remote and screens for speed and ownership. System design appears as a discussion inside the technical interview, not a separate round.

Gusto

Gusto runs an online assessment and technical screen before its virtual onsite. Design questions mirror its payroll product, such as direct deposit payouts.

Samsara

Samsara builds software for physical operations, and its design questions match: fleet tracking and sensor data ingestion. The culture rewards ownership and early responsibility.

Factory AI

Factory does not publish its process, and only the technical phone interview appears in candidate reports. Design questions follow its Droid product, which turns a ticket into a tested pull request. The team works in San Francisco five days a week, so a final office visit is likely.

Replit

Replit publishes its four stages: recruiter, hiring manager, a live or take-home technical exercise, and a panel. Technical questions come from the product itself, such as validating operational transformation edits in a shared editor. The panel tests four operating principles, one of which is Seek pain.

Modal

Modal does not publish an interview guide, and Glassdoor holds only about six interview reports. Those reports average 11 days to a decision and describe reading and analyzing existing code, not only writing it. One candidate reports a design task, though its format is not public.

LangChain

LangChain uses no algorithm puzzles. The take-home is a feature built inside its real codebase, in one day on site or about a week at home. The design round has two halves: critique LangChain's own architecture, then design a new feature.

Pinecone

Pinecone runs its coding rounds by screen share in your own editor. Reported problems lean toward systems work, such as a small key-value store or socket programming. The hiring manager screen also asks for your views on AI infrastructure.

Zoho

Zoho's reported first round is one paper mixing aptitude with code output questions. Some drives run it on paper at a Zoho office, and the pattern changes between cycles. The third round is an advanced programming build, where interviewers add requirements while you write the program.

Freshworks

Freshworks adds a dedicated design round that tests high level design and class level design together. No timed machine coding round is reported, so one candidate wrote every class on paper instead. Lead candidates also report a bar raiser round that reviews past projects and their database decisions.

Postman

Postman hires engineers through five rounds, and two of them grade design in different ways. One is a machine coding round, where you build a running program such as a URL shortener. The other is a design discussion, where API contracts and idempotency are the company's own subject.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack grades design mainly through a machine coding round of about two hours. You share your screen and may search the web, but ready-made libraries are not allowed. The reported problems come from its own product work, such as a service that streams new log lines to many clients over WebSockets.

HighRadius

HighRadius builds finance software, and its technical interviews ask about Java, SQL, and the projects on your resume. Candidates report no separate design round, so indexing, caching, and token questions appear inside that interview. The campus path adds a submission round with a short self-introduction video and a written case study.

Sprinklr

Sprinklr runs two algorithm rounds and a bar raiser round, and candidates say every round eliminates. Backend candidates report low level design instead of a named system design round, such as a producer and consumer system built without Kafka. Frontend candidates report a React machine coding round.

Dev tools and enterprise at a glance:

CompanySignature roundScreens hardest for
GitHubTake-home + pairing + code reviewAsync collaboration
AtlassianValues interview (five named values)Values alignment
ServiceNowMulti-tenant platform designEnterprise thinking
SalesforceBehavioral sampling in every roundTrust
SnowflakeData-twist codingTechnical depth, ownership
CloudflareOrange Cloud culture roundCuriosity, candor
FigmaProject deep dive with numbersDesign-engineering collaboration
NotionCRDT-aware design roundCraft, product fluency
CanvaMulti-day Craft ChallengeSimplicity as a skill
VercelReal-work rounds, Google allowedCraft, DX conviction
WizIntense panel, HM coachingPace, customer obsession
WorkdayValues scorecards + VIBE roundValues fit, warmth
RipplingBuild-then-retrospect roundOwnership, self-assessment

Defense and Frontier Tech

The defense and hard-tech companies add checks that nothing else has. At Anduril and SpaceX, mission conviction is screened in every round, and mixed feelings are a detectable, disqualifying trait. At Waymo, the same seriousness applies to safety mindset and self-awareness.

Anduril

Anduril screens for genuine motivation to build defense technology from the first recruiter call. It asks pointed product questions, like "what is your least favorite Anduril product?" Technical questions are deliberately ambiguous, and how you extract clear requirements is graded. Most roles require US person status.

Palantir

Palantir's onsite is assembled from a distinctive menu of rounds. Decomposition turns a vague real-world problem into buildable structure. Learning asks you to apply an unfamiliar tool immediately. Re-engineering has you work with existing code. Culture is filtered aggressively from the first call.

SpaceX

SpaceX runs one of the industry's most demanding loops, with five to eight rounds. The anchor is a panel presentation. You get one to two weeks to prepare a talk on your most significant work. You deliver it to five to ten engineers, and hostile questioning follows. Most roles require US citizenship or permanent residency under ITAR (a US export-control law).

Waymo

Waymo's behavioral round has the most distinctive centerpiece in tech. You present a complex past project, and you are expected to critique your own architectural decisions without being asked. Self-awareness is the graded trait. Coding questions are framed in autonomous-vehicle contexts. Design rounds cover on-vehicle systems and the simulation platform behind billions of tested miles.

Zoox

Zoox builds robotaxis, and its loop tests more C++, debugging, and math than a typical web company. Candidates report a five to six round onsite and three to five weeks from first contact to offer.

Neuralink does not publish a fixed process, and public candidate reports are scarce. Rounds follow the team, so a firmware loop and a software platform loop test different things.

Rivian

Candidates report an organized process that often finishes within one to two weeks. The technical bar is practical rather than puzzle-heavy, while the behavioral evaluation is strict.

Boston Dynamics

The loop mixes standard software questions with robotics content: perception, planning, controls, and deployment constraints. The recruiter asks about hands-on robotics experience in the very first call.

Figure AI

Figure AI adds a case study that you present to a panel of three interviewers. One reported example asked how to complete a demo in which the humanoid carries a box. Glassdoor reports put the average process at about 14 days.

Applied Intuition

The design round follows Applied Intuition's own work, and reported questions include designing an off-road autonomous vehicle and a simulation environment for V2X communication. Guides report that AI coding assistants are not allowed in live rounds. The office also has a shoeless policy, so onsite candidates wear slippers indoors.

Defense and frontier tech at a glance:

CompanySignature elementScreens hardest for
AndurilMission screening in every roundDefense conviction
PalantirDecomposition roundStructure from ambiguity
SpaceXPanel presentation with adversarial Q&AExtreme ownership
WaymoUnprompted self-critique of your own workSafety mindset, self-awareness

IT Services and Global Delivery

The large IT services companies hire fresh graduates in volumes no product company matches, most of them in India. For these employers the entrance test, not the interview, decides who gets through. TCS runs the National Qualifier Test, Wipro the Elite National Talent Hunt, and Cognizant the GenC program. These patterns are revised between hiring cycles, so confirm the current one in the notification for your own drive.

TCS

TCS hires freshers through the National Qualifier Test, reported at about 190 minutes in two parts. Your test score decides which track you are interviewed for: Ninja, Digital, or Prime. That pattern is revised between hiring cycles, so confirm it in your own drive notification.

Infosys

The Infosys first stage depends on your track. System Engineer candidates report an assessment of about 100 minutes, with pseudocode and puzzle sections, and each section has its own cutoff. Specialist Programmer candidates report a coding test of about 180 minutes instead, though these patterns are revised between hiring cycles.

Cognizant

Cognizant screens freshers in three parts, beginning with an automated assessment of spoken English. The GenC technical assessment is reported as two coding questions, two SQL questions, and one web development question. GenC, GenC Pro, GenC Next and GenC Elevate are separate programs, and the patterns change between cycles.

Wipro

Wipro's Elite National Talent Hunt test is reported at about 128 minutes, with aptitude, a written essay, and two coding problems. Candidates who clear it report a business discussion round, Wipro's own name for the technical interview. These patterns are revised between hiring cycles, so check your own drive notification.

Accenture

Accenture runs three separate online assessments before any interview. One of them grades spoken English, with tasks such as repeating sentences after audio and retelling a short story. The coding round is consistently reported as two problems in about 45 minutes, though patterns differ between drives.

Capgemini

Capgemini hires freshers in India through a named program, Exceller. The reported assessment adds a game based cognitive test and a behavioral questionnaire, and it is revised between hiring cycles. Candidates report that the coding round decides the role track offered, named A4, A4(P) and A5.

HCLTech

HCLTech screens candidates with a single online assessment of about 60 to 110 minutes, and its sections are revised between hiring cycles. Reported interviews are unusually short, sometimes about ten minutes for the technical round. A separate early career program named TechBee hires candidates after class twelve through its own tests.

Tech Mahindra

Tech Mahindra runs three online tests in sequence, including an essay and an AI evaluated speaking test. Each test eliminates candidates on its own, and the interviews that follow are reported as short. A coding first route named Supercoders runs beside the standard drive, and these patterns are revised between hiring cycles.

LTIMindtree

LTIMindtree now presents itself as LTM, and its own site redirects to ltm.com. The reported online test includes an automated spoken English module with no interviewer, scored on accent, accuracy and fluency. Candidates report that the test maps them to internal hiring levels named L0, L1 and L2, a pattern revised between hiring cycles.

What These Loops Have in Common (and Where They Diverge)

Researching these companies side by side reveals patterns worth knowing before you prepare for any of them:

  1. Practical coding is replacing puzzle coding. Many companies now evaluate through realistic work: take-homes, pairing, debugging, code review, and build-a-feature rounds. Examples include Stripe, GitHub, Canva, Shopify, Ramp, Jane Street, xAI, DoorDash, Vercel, Discord, Intuit, ElevenLabs, and Hugging Face. Pure LeetCode preparation now covers a shrinking share of the market. Pattern fluency still matters everywhere, but shipping clean, tested code while explaining your steps matters more. Grokking the Coding Interview builds the pattern base that transfers across all of these formats.
  2. Behavioral rubrics are increasingly published. More companies than ever tell you exactly what they score. Examples: Netflix's memo, the named values at Atlassian and Canva, ByteDance's ByteStyle, Databricks' principles, and Amazon-style calibration rounds at Oracle and Uber. Once you know that, the preparation is mechanical: map stories full of evidence to the named values. Grokking Modern Behavioral Interview covers the method.
  3. System design is splitting by domain. Fintech rounds assume idempotency and reconciliation. Consumer rounds assume feed fan-out and caching. AI companies assume RAG and GPU economics. Enterprise companies assume multi-tenancy and upgrade safety. The core method transfers: start with Grokking the System Design Interview, use the System Design Fundamentals course for the building blocks, and use Advanced System Design Interview, Volume II for depth. The final layer is company-specific, and that layer is what the guides above are for.
  4. AI-use policies now define interviews. The range is wide. DeepMind and Anthropic run AI-free rounds. Shopify and DoorDash allow tools with verification. Cursor requires skilled AI use and fails candidates who paste without judgment. Rippling makes tools optional but grades you against a different rubric depending on your choice. Always confirm your company's policy. If AI is allowed, practice a verify-everything workflow beforehand. For AI fluency itself, Grokking Modern AI Fundamentals covers the vocabulary that now appears in interviews everywhere.
  5. Timelines range from 11 days to 10 weeks. Ramp, xAI, Mistral, and Perplexity move in days to weeks. DeepMind, Oracle, Roblox, and Nvidia stretch toward two months or beyond. Plan your pipeline deliberately: start the slow processes first, and expect the fast companies to demand decisions early.

FAQ

How long does a tech company interview process take? Anywhere from 11 days (Ramp) to 10 weeks (Google DeepMind). The industry median is 3 to 6 weeks. Committee-based companies (Google, DeepMind, Oracle) and team-matching-heavy ones (Nvidia) run longest. Founder-led startups (Perplexity, xAI, Cursor) run fastest.

Do all companies ask system design questions? Almost all do for mid-level and senior roles, but the format varies. Most big tech runs classic architecture rounds. Some run domain-specific design (Citadel's order books, Perplexity's RAG pipelines). Palantir asks you to break down vague problems. Jane Street and Ramp place design questions inside coding rounds.

How different are behavioral interviews really? Very different. Netflix's culture round can veto a technically perfect performance. Airbnb's values interviews are run by trained outside interviewers. xAI has no behavioral round at all. Shopify replaces the whole category with a life-story conversation. Read the company-specific guide before reusing your standard stories.

Should I use AI tools during interviews? Only where explicitly permitted, and skillfully where required. Policies range from strict bans (DeepMind, Anthropic's live rounds) to active encouragement with accountability (Cursor, Shopify). Using AI where it is banned ends candidacies. Using it badly where it is encouraged does too.

We update this guide as we publish new company guides. To build the fundamentals that transfer across every loop, explore our courses, starting with Grokking the Coding Interview and Grokking the System Design Interview.

Full Interview Guides

Some companies have a guide of their own. Each one walks the whole process in detail and links every question we answer about that company.

Career Growth

What our users say

MO JAFRI

The courses which have "grokking" before them, are exceptionally well put together! These courses magically condense 3 years of CS in short bite-size courses and lectures (I have tried Grokking System Design Interview, OODI, and Coding patterns). The Grokking courses are godsent, to be honest.

Steven Zhang

Just wanted to say thanks for your Grokking the system design interview resource (https://lnkd.in/g4Wii9r7) - it helped me immensely when I was interviewing from Tableau (very little system design exp) and helped me land 18 FAANG+ jobs!

Eric

I've completed my first pass of "grokking the System Design Interview" and I can say this was an excellent use of money and time. I've grown as a developer and now know the secrets of how to build these really giant internet systems.

More From Designgurus
Annual Subscription
Get instant access to all current and upcoming courses for one year.

Access to 50+ courses

New content added monthly

Certificate of completion

$31.08

/month

Billed Annually

Recommended Course
Grokking the System Design Interview

Grokking the System Design Interview

188,183+ students

4.7

The original system design interview course from DesignGurus. Master scalable systems, critical trade-offs, and 15+ real-world design problems with a repeatable interview framework.

View Course
Join our Newsletter

Get the latest system design articles and interview tips delivered to your inbox.

Read More

10 Must-Read System Design Papers for Engineers (2026)

Arslan Ahmad

Arslan Ahmad

How to Approach Any System Design Question in a Tech Interview

Arslan Ahmad

Arslan Ahmad

2025 System Design Roadmap: From Beginner to Advanced

Arslan Ahmad

Arslan Ahmad

Complete Load Balancer Guide 2026

Arslan Ahmad

Arslan Ahmad

Design Gurus logo
One-Stop Portal For Tech Interviews.
Copyright © 2026 Design Gurus, LLC. All rights reserved.