0% completed
In this lesson, we will explore three complex coding interview problems that cover a variety of algorithms and problem-solving techniques. We’ll look at problems involving sorting, tree traversal, and greedy algorithms. These examples are designed to help you understand how to approach different types of problems in competitive programming and improve your problem-solving skills.
1. Problem: Merge Intervals
Problem Statement: Given an array of intervals where intervals[i] = [start, end], merge all overlapping intervals and return an array of the non-overlapping intervals that cover all the intervals in the input.
Time Complexity for Merge Intervals Algorithm
-
Sorting Step:
- The first operation in the code is sorting the
intervals
array based on the start times. - Time Complexity of Sorting: The sorting step takes O(n \log n), where
n
is the number of intervals. This is due to the use of a comparison-based sorting algorithm such as Timsort.
- The first operation in the code is sorting the
-
Merging Step:
- The for-loop iterates through each interval exactly once, performing O(1) operations for each iteration to check for overlaps and merge intervals if necessary.
- Time Complexity of the Loop: The loop runs in O(n) because it processes each of the
n
intervals once.
Overall Time Complexity:
- The overall time complexity is dominated by the sorting step: O(n \log n)
Space Complexity for Merge Intervals Algorithm
-
Space for Sorting:
- The sorting has a space complexity of O(\log n) due to the use of in-place sorting for primitive types.
-
Auxiliary Space for Merging:
- The
merged
list is used to store the merged intervals. In the worst case, if there are no overlapping intervals, the list will store alln
intervals, resulting in O(n) space.
- The
-
Output Array:
- The
toArray()
method creates a new array to return the result, which also takes O(n) space.
- The
Overall Space Complexity:
- The total space complexity is: O(n)
The primary contributor to space usage is the
List
used for storing merged intervals and the output array.
2. Problem: Maximum Path Sum in a Binary Tree
Problem Statement: Given a non-empty binary tree, find the maximum path sum. The path may start and end at any node in the tree.
Time Complexity for Maximum Path Sum in a Binary Tree
-
Recursive Calls:
- The function
findMaxPath(TreeNode node)
is called recursively for each node in the tree. - Number of Calls: Each node in the tree is visited exactly once during the traversal.
- Overall Time Complexity: O(n), where
n
is the number of nodes in the binary tree. Each node is processed once, making the traversal linear in relation to the number of nodes.
- The function
-
Operations per Node:
- For each node, the following operations are performed:
- Calculating
leftMax
andrightMax
using recursive calls → O(1) for each operation. - Calculating
maxSum
by comparing and updating → O(1). - Returning the result for the current node → O(1).
- Calculating
- The total work done at each node is constant, O(1), so the time complexity remains O(n) as each node is visited once.
- For each node, the following operations are performed:
Space Complexity for Maximum Path Sum in a Binary Tree
-
Recursive Call Stack:
- The space complexity due to recursion depends on the maximum depth of the tree (i.e., the height
h
). - Balanced Tree: For a balanced tree, the height is O(\log n).
- Unbalanced Tree (Skewed): In the worst case (e.g., a tree that behaves like a linked list), the height is O(n).
- The space complexity due to recursion depends on the maximum depth of the tree (i.e., the height
-
Auxiliary Space:
- No additional data structures are used that depend on the size of the input, aside from the recursion stack.
Overall Space Complexity:
- Best Case (Balanced Tree): O(\log n)
- Worst Case (Unbalanced Tree): O(n)
3. Problem: Fractional Knapsack (Greedy Algorithm)
Problem Statement: Given the weights and values of n
items, put these items in a knapsack of capacity W
to get the maximum total value in the knapsack. You can take fractions of items.
Time Complexity for Fractional Knapsack Problem
-
Sorting Step:
- The items array is sorted based on the value-to-weight ratio in descending order.
- Time Complexity of Sorting: Sorting the array of
n
items takes O(n \log n) due to the use of a comparison-based sorting algorithm (Timsort in Java'sArrays.sort()
).
-
Iterating Through Items:
- The loop iterates over each of the
n
items once to add them or fractions of them to the knapsack. - Time Complexity of Loop: O(n).
- The loop iterates over each of the
Overall Time Complexity:
- The overall time complexity is: O(n \log n)
The sorting step dominates the runtime.
Space Complexity for Fractional Knapsack Problem
-
Auxiliary Space:
- The space used for sorting is O(\log n) due to the in-place sorting algorithm.
- No additional data structures are used, apart from a few variables to store the total value and the capacity
W
.
-
Space for Input:
- The input
items
array does not count toward auxiliary space complexity as it is provided as input and not created within the function.
- The input
Overall Space Complexity:
- The total space complexity is: O(1) for auxiliary space, as the algorithm does not require additional data structures that scale with input size beyond sorting space.
.....
.....
.....
Table of Contents
Contents are not accessible
Contents are not accessible
Contents are not accessible
Contents are not accessible
Contents are not accessible