Grokking Amazon Coding Interview
Vote

0% completed

Solution: Make Array Zero by Subtracting Equal Amounts

Problem Statement

Examples

Solution

Step-by-step Algorithm

Code

Complexity Analysis

Time Complexity

Space Complexity

Problem Statement

Given an array of positive integers nums, return the minimum number of operations required to make all elements of nums 0.

In one operation, you must:

  • Select a positive integer n such that n is less than or equal to the smallest positive element in nums.
  • Subtract n from every non-zero element in nums.

Examples

  • Example 1:

    • Input: nums = [3,3,2]
    • Expected Output: 2
    • Justification: Subtract 2 from all non-zero elements to get [1,1,0]. Then, subtract 1 to get all zeros. 2 steps are required.
  • Example 2:

    • Input: [1,2,3,4,5]
    • Expected Output: 5
    • Justification: Since all elements are unique, each step involves subtracting 1 from a unique non-zero element, requiring 5 steps to turn the array into zeros.
  • Example 3:

    • Input: [4,4,4,3,3,2,2,1]
    • Expected Output: 4
    • Justification: After removing duplicates, we have [4,3,2,1]. Each number represents a unique subtraction step, hence 4 steps are needed.

Solution

To solve this problem, the most effective strategy is to focus on the unique non-zero elements in the array. Since subtracting the same amount from different numbers doesn't depend on the numbers being consecutive or related, we can essentially "ignore" the operation's effect on the array's structure and simply count how many unique operations we can perform. This approach is efficient because it directly correlates the number of steps to the number of unique non-zero values in the array, bypassing the need to simulate each subtraction operation.

First, we filter out all zeros from the array since they do not affect the operation count. Then, by converting the remaining numbers to a set, we eliminate duplicates, leaving us with the unique non-zero values. The size of this set directly gives us the answer: it represents the minimum number of distinct subtraction operations needed to reduce every element to zero. This method is straightforward and avoids unnecessary computations, making it an optimal solution for the problem.

Step-by-step Algorithm

  1. Initialize a Set: Start by creating an empty set. This set will be used to store the unique non-zero elements found in the input array. The use of a set ensures that each element is counted only once, regardless of how many times it appears in the array.

  2. Iterate Over the Array: Loop through each element in the input array. For each element, check if it is greater than zero. We are only interested in non-zero elements because zeros do not affect our operation count.

  3. Add Non-Zero Elements to the Set: If an element is greater than zero, add it to the set created in step 1. Since sets automatically handle duplicates, any repeated non-zero value will not affect the size of the set.

  4. Calculate the Size of the Set: After all non-zero elements have been added to the set, the size of the set represents the number of unique non-zero values in the original array. This size directly corresponds to the minimum number of steps required to reduce all elements to zero.

  5. Return the Size of the Set: The final step of the algorithm is to return the size of the set as the answer. This value indicates the minimum number of subtraction operations needed to turn the array into all zeros.

mediaLink

nums = [4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1]. Each distinct positive value needs exactly one subtraction pass, so count the unique values.

1 of 10

Code

Python3
Python3

. . . .

Complexity Analysis

Time Complexity

The primary operation in the algorithm is iterating through the input array once, leading to an overall O(N) time complexity, where N is the number of elements in the array.

Space Complexity

The extra space is used to store unique non-zero elements in a set or map. In the worst case, if all elements are unique and non-zero, the space complexity would be O(N). However, since we're focusing on the unique non-zero elements, it's more precise to denote it as O(U).

Reading Progress

0%


Vote for new content

On This Page

Problem Statement

Examples

Solution

Step-by-step Algorithm

Code

Complexity Analysis

Time Complexity

Space Complexity