0% completed
Pair with Target Sum (easy)
On This Page
Problem Statement
Try it yourself
Problem Statement
Given an array of numbers sorted in ascending order and a target sum, find a pair in the array whose sum is equal to the given target.
Write a function to return the indices of the two numbers (i.e. the pair) such that they add up to the given target. If no such pair exists return [-1, -1].
Example 1:
Input: [1, 2, 3, 4, 6], target=6
Output: [1, 3]
Explanation: The numbers at index 1 and 3 add up to 6: 2+4=6
Example 2:
Input: [2, 5, 9, 11], target=11
Output: [0, 2]
Explanation: The numbers at index 0 and 2 add up to 11: 2+9=11
Constraints:
- 2 <= arr.length <= 10<sup>4</sup>
- -10<sup>9</sup> <= arr[i] <= 10<sup>9</sup>
- -10<sup>9</sup> <= target <= 10<sup>9</sup>
- Only
onevalid answer exists.
Try it yourself
Try solving this question here:
Janarth Kumaresan
· 10 days ago
# Assembly .global two_sum .text # two_sum(const int* arr, size_t n, int target) # # Register Mapping (System V ABI): # rdi = arr (pointer to 32-bit signed integers) # rsi = n (length of array) # edx = target (32-bit signed integer target sum) # # Return Value: # rax = combined indices: (left << 32) | (right) # Returns -1 (0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) if no pair exists. two_sum: # 1. Edge case check: if n < 2, return [-1, -1] cmp rsi, 2 jl .not_found # 2. Initialize two pointers (indices) xor r8, r8 # r8 = left = 0 mov r9, rsi dec r9 # r9 = right = n - 1 .loop: # If left >= right, we searched the whole array without finding a pair cmp r8, r9 jge .not_found # Load arr[left] and arr[right] (
sanjeev saini
· 4 months ago
finding a pair only with two pointer approach is basic, but via hashmap we can find multiple pairs too. Even asked in the interview.
public class PairWithTargetSumA1 {
private void search(int[] arr, int targetSum) {
Map<Integer, Integer> map = new HashMap<>();
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
int complement = targetSum - arr[i];
if (map.containsKey(complement)) {
System.*out*.println(complement + " " + arr[i]);
}
map.put(arr[i], i);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
PairWithTargetSumA1 obj = new PairWithTargetSumA1();
obj.search(new int[] {7, 4, 9, 3, 2, 8, 1}, 10);
}
}
Akshay Kumar
· 10 months ago
class Solution: def search(self, arr, target_sum): l,r = 0, len(arr)-1 while l<r: if arr[l]+arr[r]>target_sum: r-=1 elif arr[l]+arr[r]<target_sum: l+=1 else: return l,r return -1,-1
**InputError 0.093 s Traceback (most recent call last): File "/box/Parsers.py", line 81, in parse return json.loads(line) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/local/python-3.12.3/lib/python3.12/json/init.py", line 346, in loads return _default_decoder.decode(s) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/local/python-3.12.3/lib/python3.12/json/decoder.py", line 337, in decode obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end()) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/local/python-3.12.3/lib/python3.12/json/decoder.py", line 355, in raw_decode raise JSONDeco
Nirav Patel
· 2 years ago
For Input Arr = [3,2,4] and targetSum = 6, Expected output = [1,2] But Actual output = [-1, -1].
This is a wrong answer.
sealess
· 3 years ago
class Solution: def search(self, arr, target_sum): # TODO: Write your code here l, r = 0, len(arr) - 1 while l<r: curr= arr[l] + arr[r] if curr>target_sum: r-=1 elif curr<target_sum: l+=1 else: return [l,r] return [-1, -1]
Semih kekül
· 3 years ago
Question text should say to return -1,-1 when no result exists.
CaptainKidd
· 4 years ago
FYI if anyone else thinks they're going crazy two-pointer and sliding window have switched spots. I think it's a correct move as sliding window feels like a more specialized version of two-pointer so you get the benefit of general to specifics.
Deko
· 4 years ago
I think it's important to mention that the solution with a HashMap works even when the array is unsorted.
Bryan Pena
· 4 years ago
I keep getting [-1,-1]as the result even though its clear that there is a correct answer from the output
ornella
· 5 years ago
This one is NOT working on LeetCode. Can someone help me with this please?
Reading Progress
0%
On This Page
Problem Statement
Try it yourself