Grokking Idempotency in System Design – A Must-Know for Developers
This blog is about idempotency in API design, defining what it is and how to implement it. By the end, you’ll learn how mastering idempotency can help you build fault-tolerant APIs that handle retries and duplicate requests gracefully.
Ever clicked a "Submit" button twice because nothing seemed to happen the first time?
Worried you might have ordered two of the same item or charged your card twice?
That moment of panic is exactly what idempotency in API design is meant to prevent.
Whether you’re building a payment system, an order-processing backend, or just trying to avoid duplicate user signups, idempotency ensures your APIs behave reliably—even when users (or machines) make the same request more than once.
In this blog, we’ll break down what idempotency really means, why it’s critical for building fault-tolerant systems, and how to implement it correctly in your APIs.
So, let’s get into it.
What is Idempotency in API Design?
In simple terms, idempotency means that performing the same action multiple times has the same effect as doing it once.
In the context of web APIs, an idempotent API endpoint guarantees that a client can send the same request repeatedly without causing unintended side effects or inconsistent results.
The outcome after the first successful request remains the final outcome, no matter how many times the request is repeated.
For example, imagine an API to create a user account. If that API is idempotent, calling it twice with the same details will not create two accounts – it will create the account only once on the first call.
Subsequent identical calls might simply return a message like "user already exists" or the same success response, but they won’t duplicate the data.
The key point: idempotency is determined by the effect on the system’s state, not just the response.
No matter how many times you call an idempotent operation, the system state stays the same after the initial call.
Idempotent vs. Non-Idempotent HTTP Methods
You might be wondering, "Which API operations are naturally idempotent, and which aren’t?" By HTTP standard definitions, some request methods are inherently idempotent:
-
GET (and HEAD, OPTIONS, TRACE): These are safe methods that do not modify server state. No matter how many times you
GETa resource, it should just fetch data without side effects, so repeating a GET call has the same effect as one call. -
PUT: Typically used for updating or replacing a resource. If you call
PUT /resource/123multiple times with the same data, the resource ends up in the same state after the first call (subsequent calls overwrite the state with the same value). The result: no change beyond the initial update – hence, PUT is idempotent. -
DELETE: Used to delete a resource. The first
DELETE /item/123removes the item; further identical delete calls might return a "Not Found" response, but they don’t change the state again (the item is already gone). Thus, DELETE is considered idempotent (assuming it’s deleting a specific identified resource and not something like "delete last item" which could remove multiple different items over multiple calls).
On the other hand:
-
POST: Usually used to create new resources or trigger operations, and it’s not idempotent by default. For example, calling
POST /userstwice might create two separate users if no protections are in place. Each POST could have a different effect (new resource each time), so clients must be careful with retries. -
PATCH: Used for partial updates. PATCH is generally not idempotent either, because if the patch operation is something like "increment a value" or "append to a list," each repeat will further change the state. (If PATCH is used in a very controlled way like setting a specific known value, it might behave idempotently, but in practice it's safer to assume PATCH is non-idempotent.)
The key takeaway is: idempotency is about the effect on the server-state.
An idempotent method means one call or many calls lead to the same final state.
Non-idempotent methods can change state with each call, so we need additional measures to handle duplicate requests for those.
Implementing Idempotency in APIs
Knowing what idempotency is and why it matters is half the battle.
The real question is: how do we implement idempotency for operations that aren’t naturally idempotent (like POST), especially in scenarios where reliability is a must (payment processing, account creation, etc.)?
Let’s break down some strategies for mastering idempotent API design:
1. Use Unique Identifiers (Idempotency Keys)
One common approach is to include a unique idempotency key with each request.
This could be a GUID/UUID generated by the client, or by the server, that identifies a specific operation attempt.
For example, a client submitting a payment could send a header Idempotency-Key: 123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426614174000.
The server will use this key to recognize subsequent retries of the same request.
How it Works
The server stores the idempotency key (often combined with information like the endpoint and the user ID to ensure uniqueness across different users or actions) along with the result of the operation (success response, any side effects performed, etc.).
If the same key is seen again, the server knows “Ah, I’ve processed this exact request before.”
Instead of performing the action again (which could, say, charge the card again or create a duplicate record), the server can directly return the saved result from the first attempt.
This makes the second call appear successful (or identical) from the client’s perspective, without repeating the side effect.
To implement this, you’ll need a place to store these keys and results.
A fast key-value store like Redis or a database table works well.
The storage should be accessible by all instances of your service (so a single in-memory variable on one server isn’t enough, especially in a load-balanced or cloud environment). Typically, you’d set a Time-To-Live (TTL) on these stored keys – commonly around 24 hours – after which the keys expire and are removed.
This prevents the store from growing indefinitely and acknowledges that clients usually won’t retry the same request after a day. (For instance, Stripe’s API automatically removes idempotency keys after 24 hours.)
2. Design Safer "Create" Operations
Another strategy is to design your APIs in a way that makes creation operations idempotent by natural keys.
For example, instead of a generic POST /orders that generates a new order every time, you could use a put-if-absent approach: PUT /orders/{orderId} where the client generates a unique order ID (or the server does and the client uses it for subsequent retries).
The first call creates the order with that ID; further calls to the same URL simply overwrite the order with the same data (or return the existing order).
This effectively makes the operation idempotent because the URL (or resource identifier) is tied to a single creation event.
Many databases also support idempotent upsert operations or unique constraints (e.g., a unique email for user signup) so that a duplicate attempt fails rather than creates a new record.
You can catch that failure and return a result indicating the resource already exists, instead of creating a second one.
3. Proper Response Handling
When implementing idempotency, pay attention to responses and status codes.
For instance, if a repeat request is detected and no new action is taken, you might still return a 200 OK with the same response body as the original request, indicating success (and not confusing the client with an error).
Some APIs choose to return a status code 409 (Conflict) or a specific message to indicate a duplicate request, but it’s often simpler to respond as if the request was processed normally (idempotently) to keep client logic simple.
The main idea is that the client shouldn’t have to worry whether it was the first attempt or a retry – the outcome is the same.
4. Expiration and Idempotency Windows
As mentioned, idempotency keys or deduplication logic should not live forever.
Decide on a window during which repeats are considered “the same”.
For most web APIs, a 24-hour window for idempotency keys is generous. After that, it’s assumed that any retry is probably a new intent, not an immediate duplicate.
This window can be shorter (e.g., one hour) if you want to free resources sooner and if it fits your use case.
Just ensure the window covers the typical retry timeframe (for example, a user might retry a purchase within a few minutes, not usually days later).
5. Idempotency in Distributed Systems
If your system involves asynchronous processing (like message queues or event buses), you should also think about idempotency on the consumer side.
For example, a service might receive the same message twice (due to at-least-once delivery semantics).
Applying an idempotent consumer pattern – e.g., deduplicating messages by an event ID or transaction ID – ensures the processing logic only acts once per unique event.
This extends the idempotency concept beyond just HTTP APIs into the realm of system design (and is often a talking point in advanced system design interviews).
Conclusion
Idempotency might seem like an advanced concept, but at its core, it’s about being graceful under pressure – ensuring your API does the right thing even if it’s called twice, five times, or hundreds of times.
In this blog, we explored how idempotency works and why it’s essential for building reliable APIs.
From avoiding double-charging a customer to preventing duplicate records in your database, idempotent design saves the day.
As you implement these ideas, you’ll find your applications become more robust against glitches and retries, resulting in happier users.
What our users say
pikacodes
I've tried every possible resource (Blind 75, Neetcode, YouTube, Cracking the Coding Interview, Udemy) and idk if it was just the right time or everything finally clicked but everything's been so easy to grasp recently with Grokking the Coding Interview!
Steven Zhang
Just wanted to say thanks for your Grokking the system design interview resource (https://lnkd.in/g4Wii9r7) - it helped me immensely when I was interviewing from Tableau (very little system design exp) and helped me land 18 FAANG+ jobs!
Arijeet
Just completed the “Grokking the system design interview”. It's amazing and super informative. Have come across very few courses that are as good as this!
